Red state (Missouri) bans police from enforcing federal gun laws

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • MigraineMan

    Active Member
    Jun 9, 2011
    15,277
    Frederick County
    Kansas City Star Editorial....

    Editorial: Parson’s signature on gun bill violates US Constitution, makes Missourians less safe

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/e...s-safe/ar-AAL3wld?ocid=mailsignout&li=BBnbfcL

    The Kansas City Star Editorial Board: Parson’s signature on this gun bill violates the US Constitution

    Me: How does it violate the US Constitution?

    KCSEB: By declaring Federal laws invalid!

    Me: Wait, doesn't their declaration state “All federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, rules, and regulations, that infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms … shall be invalid to this state"?

    KCSEB: Yes. Missouri cannot enjoy the protections of representative government when it routinely discards the Constitution on a whim.

    Me: Seems they're saying "laws that violate the US Constitution are invalid." Isn't that what a State is supposed to do?

    KCSEB: The idea that a state legislature can nullify a federal law is abhorrent. Doing so supports slavery.

    Me: Wait ... again ... they're violating the US Constitution by explicitly supporting it?

    KCSEB: Why are you such a racist?
     

    mpollan1

    Fvck Joe Biden
    Sep 26, 2012
    1,832
    Мэриленд
    The Kansas City Star Editorial Board: Parson’s signature on this gun bill violates the US Constitution

    Me: How does it violate the US Constitution?

    KCSEB: By declaring Federal laws invalid!

    Me: Wait, doesn't their declaration state “All federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, rules, and regulations, that infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms … shall be invalid to this state"?

    KCSEB: Yes. Missouri cannot enjoy the protections of representative government when it routinely discards the Constitution on a whim.

    Me: Seems they're saying "laws that violate the US Constitution are invalid." Isn't that what a State is supposed to do?

    KCSEB: The idea that a state legislature can nullify a federal law is abhorrent. Doing so supports slavery.

    Me: Wait ... again ... they're violating the US Constitution by explicitly supporting it?

    KCSEB: Why are you such a racist?

    I have to ask, is this transcript real? Holy hell Batman.
     

    Boats

    Beer, Bikes n Boomsticks
    Mar 13, 2012
    2,593
    Howeird County
    *****The men who wrote the constitution were some of the finest minds of their (or any) day. I'm amazed at how succinct and well written the Constitution is along with documents like the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist Papers and other such writings of their day. Remarkably well thought out, and in the Federalist papers one can clearly see the thinking Jay, Hamilton and Madison had on a variety of issues of their day.

    Just for the sake of argument, if there *was* something in the Constitution about wizzing or hookers - I kind of wonder how nicely it would have been written to withstand the test of time by the men who wrote our founding documents... Maybe wizzing and hookers wouldn't have been in the Bill of Rights, but how cool if it had been codified into some kind of short addendum on wizzocity and/or hookerocity (if only those were commonly used words!!!) with respect to our nation and the rights of men and prostitutes. I'm thinking if those two things HAD been in the Constitution we wouldn't have some of the horrible problems we have today!!!

    Incontinence and hookers would no longer be seen as bad things but as rights we have as men of the greatest nation on Earth!!!

    Or sumthin'

    Surprised there isn't something in the constitution about those things. John Adams was a fan of boning outdoors while wrapped in furs and Ben Franklin was basically a man-whore.
     

    Inigoes

    Head'n for the hills
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 21, 2008
    44,842
    SoMD / West PA
    The Missouri Supreme Court this week reversed a decision by 19th Circuit Court Judge Dan Green, who refused to stop the enforcement of Missouri's "Second Amendment Preservation Act," which punishes Missouri law enforcement agencies for enforcing federal gun laws.

     

    KingClown

    SOmething Witty
    Jul 29, 2020
    475
    Deep Blue MD
    Just do what the child sniffer does and ignore the courts and continue punishing them for working with the fed. I mean the racist one gets away with it so they should be able to as well
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    85,225
    Just do what the *child sniffer does and ignore the courts and continue punishing them for working with the fed. I mean *the racist one gets away with it so they should be able to as well
    So… *Joe Biden… and *Barack Obama.

    Got it.
     

    jrumann59

    DILLIGAF
    Feb 17, 2011
    11,563
    Sorry if one side decided its OK to ignore some federal laws they really can't get mad when the other side follows suit.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    258,682
    Messages
    6,537,253
    Members
    29,479
    Latest member
    Surf

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom