RoadDawg
Nos nostraque Deo
- Dec 6, 2010
- 94,450
In many ways I agree with most of what you’ve said in this post. However, there is not any possible means of doing what you said in the bolder portion, when the criminal enterprise has taken money from hundreds of thousands of anonymous victims.There's a problem with giving forfeiture money to charitable or non-profit organisations; many such orgs have agendas that are unacceptable to many people. BLM would be one, any Soros-influenced org would be another. Red Cross is far from my favorite "charity" based on its treatment of its employees, for only one reason. I'm anecdotally informed that during WWII the bulk of the US army members felt that it was far from accomplishing its mission. They gave high marks to the Salvation Army, whose religious bent would be problematic in today's world.
Forfeiture is theft. Monies taken based on illegal activity should be returned in toto to those harmed by the enterprise; none of it should be spent on operating the bureaucratic machinery of the return, to prevent government from siphoning funds to itself.
In those cases, the only way of recompense to the victims, is to use the ill gotten gains to promote the fight against the very crimes which victimized them.