TRACT Optics

NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • hodgepodge

    Senior Member (Gold)
    Sep 3, 2009
    9,751
    Arnold, MD
    20-1507 ASSN. OF NJ RIFLE, ET AL. V. BRUCK, ATT'Y GEN. OF NJ, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).


    In 2018, New Jersey made it illegal to possess a magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. N.J. Stat. 2C:39-1(y), 2C:39-3(j). Prior to that, it had been illegal in New Jersey to possess magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds of ammunition. Owners of large-capacity magazines (LCMs) could modify their LCMs, render firearms with LCMs or the LCM itself inoperable, register firearms with LCMs that could not be modified; transfer the firearm or LCM to an individual or entity entitled to own or possess it; or surrender the firearm or LCM to law enforcement.
     

    Boondock Saint

    Active Member
    Dec 11, 2008
    22,612
    White Marsh
    Will the NJ mag case effect MD?
    Directly, no. But SCOTUS has shown its intention: get this crap sorted out given what we just said in Bruen. That indirectly informs lower courts, ours included, that such nonsense won't be tolerated.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    264,903
    Messages
    6,818,518
    Members
    31,264
    Latest member
    737ck

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom