Pretty interesting. I would think the state would try to appeal this. If not, this opens the door to Mass having to recognize Constitutional Carry states' residents.
I don't know if this will necessarily stand, I have to be honest.
Very true.The Camel just stuck his nose under the tent flap. But a lower court properly, IMHO, applied Bruen in a case that has significance to gun owners all over the country.
The occasionally proposed national reciprocity bill includes a provision that for residents of Con Carry their state issued ID from that state is their permit.Blanket recognition of Con Carry State residents is two leaps down the road . Recognitiongnition of actual Permits is step one .
Yup. See COTUS, Article III Section 2 Clause 12x Wv has asked Maryland AG to recognize Wv permits. The first letter was kinda formal. The second letter was more like if you harass West Virginians driving thru Maryland, I’m coming for you. Its my understanding that such a suit would go straight to the Supreme Court. Now that Morrissey may have his eyes on Governor or Manchins seat. I haven’t heard much. Maybe a letter to him is in order.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State, between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Here is another analysis of the case:
Interesting, if the anti gunners push back too hard on the "But you need a permit to exercise your right." argument they just might end up abolishing permits altogether.