DE AWB and LCM Ban Case

[jcutonilli]

To those that still think these cases are easy to win, here is another judge denying a PI in the DE AWB and LCM case.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.79510/gov.uscourts.ded.79510.58.0.pdf

 

[pcfixer]

REASON:
Richard Gibson Andrews is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. He is a former Delaware state prosecutor and Assistant United States Attorney. Wikipedia

• Born: December 22, 1955 (age 67), Manchester, England
• Education: Haverford College, UC Berkeley School of Law
• Party Affiliation: Democratic Party (United States)

This is the result of having a judiciary that has not been sanctioned or held to account for their unlawful decisions over the last several decades. This is why activism in the judiciary is so dangerous and should be dealt with very harshly, breaking down the laws of our country. Shameful and infuriating. Thanks Mr. Smith

This Judge has "Belief Bias", And Yes I think he suffers from Cognitive dissonance.

Edit: The Judge FAILED to apply No. 20–843 Bruen decision. That simple!!

 

[RFBfromDE]

Meanwhile, Israel gets criticized for proposed judicial reforms.

 

[Allen65]

Meanwhile, Israel gets criticized for proposed judicial reforms.

Two wrongs don't make a right. Dictatorship by simple parliamentary majority is no better than dictatorship from the bench. Checks and balances are the best solution.

 

[pcfixer]

Agreed @Allen65 @RFBfromDE Meanwhile here at the ranch WE wait on Theodore David Chuang. Same issues as #2

 

[RFBfromDE]

Israel’s judicial reforms may be getting mischaracterized the way “don’t say gay” laws have been here.

But perhaps that is another topic.

 

[Allen65]

Israel’s judicial reforms may be getting mischaracterized the way “don’t say gay” laws have been here.

But perhaps that is another topic.

But, like the RESTRICT Act just introduced in Congress here, a bill that does have some useful fixes in it (changes to selection of judges) is being used as a vehicle to surreptitiously pass other changes that would never stand on their own.

 

[RFBfromDE]

...or the infamous Patriot Act.

 

[Allen65]

...or the infamous Patriot Act.

Exactly.

 

[jcutonilli]

REASON:
Richard Gibson Andrews is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. He is a former Delaware state prosecutor and Assistant United States Attorney. Wikipedia

• Born: December 22, 1955 (age 67), Manchester, England
• Education: Haverford College, UC Berkeley School of Law
• Party Affiliation: Democratic Party (United States)

This is the result of having a judiciary that has not been sanctioned or held to account for their unlawful decisions over the last several decades. This is why activism in the judiciary is so dangerous and should be dealt with very harshly, breaking down the laws of our country. Shameful and infuriating. Thanks Mr. Smith

This Judge has "Belief Bias", And Yes I think he suffers from Cognitive dissonance.

Edit: The Judge FAILED to apply No. 20–843 Bruen decision. That simple!!

It is not that simple. The judge did look at the historical analogs (as Bruen mandates) and found that they support that they support the law. While I can't agree with his conclusion, he did apply Bruen to the decision.

 

[Blacksmith101]

Judge Andrews just showed everyone he did not read Heller and Bruen without telling anyone he did not read Heller and Bruen!

 

[whistlersmother]

If Heller and Bruen go against his personal belief system, he can ignore those, right?

 

[jcutonilli]

If Heller and Bruen go against his personal belief system, he can ignore those, right?

There will be very few if any judges that will ignore Heller and Bruen. There is still places where judgement is required. What tends to happen is that these judgements get skewed toward their belief system. This is what happened in this case.

 

[Mark75H]

I agree, without sanction, there is no incentive to prevent misbehavior

 

[adit]

We'll see if he is a man of his word.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/RichardAndrews-QFRs.pdf

4. In general, Supreme Court precedents are binding on all lower federal courts and Circuit Court precedents are binding on the district courts within the particular circuit. Are you committed to following the precedents of higher courts faithfully and giving them full force and effect, even if you personally disagree with such precedents?

Response: Yes.

I dug this up on him back in January from his Senate confirmation. I guess we have our answer.

 

[lazarus]

Israel’s judicial reforms may be getting mischaracterized the way “don’t say gay” laws have been here.

But perhaps that is another topic.

They have not been. But that isn't really related to the thread.