Afrikeber
Ultimate Member
Dirty Harry would approve.
As Biggfoot44 pointed out, this is a secondary analysis of the Eleflitz data. I think a lot of the questions being asked in this thread are discussed by the original author:
An Alternate Look at Handgun Stopping Power
Written by: Greg Ellifritz I've been interested in firearm stopping power for a very long time. I remember reading Handguns magazine back in the late 1980s when Evan Marshall was writing articles aboutwww.activeresponsetraining.net
According to the data, no he wouldn't. He would have used a .357 if he wanted to be REALLY effective. Discussed up thread on what the original author had said, there are flaws in the data collection. But I can't conceive of a world where a .357 is more effective than a .44 magnum, unless it's a world where people only get shot in the foot with the 44.Dirty Harry would approve.
According to the data, no he wouldn't. He would have used a .357 if he wanted to be REALLY effective. Discussed up thread on what the original author had said, there are flaws in the data collection. But I can't conceive of a world where a .357 is more effective than a .44 magnum, unless it's a world where people only get shot in the foot with the 44.
Could be the case depending on what is being used again, sure.Counterintuitive perhaps , but indeed so . It has to do with bullet performance , and bullet design parameters .
.357 Mag defensive/ duty ammo , in the sterotypical 125 and 110 gr JHP are optimized for massive expansion , and moderate penetration on human targets . To the point that some criticize them for too much expansion .
Most .44 Mag ammo has at least partial eye on hunting of deer and larger game . Even 180 jhp . and 210 Silvertip is designed for the compromise overlap of deep end of plausible for human defense & shallow side of plausible for broadside on whitetail .