The 10th circuit delivered an opinion saying a women convicted of check fraud in 2008 doesn't deserve to have her 2A rights restored. The 10th CA ruling conflicts with 3rd circuit allowing a man convicted of welfare fraud to get his 2A rights back.
Looks like its time for SCOTUS to rule.
Lets hope Amy Coney-Barret finds her spine again because the last few times something gun related has been there for Injunctions TRO's and Stay's she may as well have been a lib
Tenth Circuit: The Supreme Court’s ruling in Bruen did not indisputably and pellucidly abrogate our precedent that permits the feds to ban people convicted of non-violent felonies (here, bank fraud) from ever possessing firearms.
This is how to ignore SCOTUS... run around signing "la la la" with fingers stuck in ears.
The fleas inhabiting the minds of the 10th circuit judges just want someone else to take responsibility for saying the obvious part out loud. Never let it be said a judge should force accountability on criminals and a judicial system that allows violent predators back into civilized society.
Hopefully they do take it but SCOTUS may want other circuits to also weigh in. I'm not sure how many other similar-situated cases have been decided in other circuits, probably not many post Bruen at least.