Challenges to ATF “Ghost Gun” Final Rule (ATF 2021R-05) Megathread

[King Chicken]

....Maryland still says you can't have unmarked lowers am I right? This case above would have any possible future implications on MD but needs to go to Supreme Court or what?

So many different laws and cases I'm starting to get absolutely lost on this.

 

[teratos]

....Maryland still says you can't have unmarked lowers am I right? This case above would have any possible future implications on MD but needs to go to Supreme Court or what?

So many different laws and cases I'm starting to get absolutely lost on this.

Yes. A similar case will need to be heard by SCOTUS or the 4th Circuit to be binding in MD.

 

[Doctor_M]

Ghosts go BOOOOooo
Ghost guns go BOOOOmmm

I prefer the latter.

 

[Blacksmith101]

Ghosts go BOOOOooo
Ghost guns go BOOOOmmm

I prefer the latter.

An Elephant fart in a cave goes WOOOoommm

 

[King Chicken]

An Elephant fart in a cave goes WOOOoommm

A human farting inside of an elephant goes

 

[King Chicken]

Yes. A similar case will need to be heard by SCOTUS or the 4th Circuit to be binding in MD.

Ty. And um. Tell me when this might happen SIR?! can this happen within a couple years? No clue where things are w this. Ty

 

[pcfixer]

Yes. A similar case will need to be heard by SCOTUS or the 4th Circuit to be binding in MD.

SCOTUS possible-- IF-- US attorney general decision to push!!?? IDN
https://www.saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-03-02-Injunction.pdf

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion in part and ORDERS that Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, and employees are enjoined from implementing and enforcing against Defense Distributed and its customers (except for those individuals prohibited from possessing firearms under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)) the provisions in 27 C.F.R. §§ 478.11 and 478.12 that the Court has preliminarily determined are unlawful.

BREAKING NEWS: Preliminary Injunction Granted Against ATF's Ghost Gun Rule!!!​

It's almost April. Us supreme court fall docket

 

[pcfixer]

VanDerStok v. Garland (4:22-cv-00691) District Court, N.D. Texas​

VanDerStok v. Garland, 4:22-cv-00691 - CourtListener.com

Docket for VanDerStok v. Garland, 4:22-cv-00691 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

WE REALLY Need the WIN here! :prayer

 

[GTOGUNNER]

Some stuff going on with this case. Take a look at the link in above post.

 

[owldo]

Some stuff going on with this case. Take a look at the link in above post.

If I read it correctly plaintiffs appealed the case from the Northern District Federal Court to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ... the INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL kicks it to the full 5th circuit ... It appears plaintiffs didn't like this judge or some of his rulings ! Good news is if it is going to the 5th Circuit this circuit is overseen by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. Maybe some legal eagles on here can correct me if I am wrong ?