Makes sense from their perspective, though. Gun bans are driven by the Antis' fears, so why would they not try to apply them to the most threatening places?Some of the worse places you can't carry, logic is strong with the leftist
Makes sense from their perspective, though. Gun bans are driven by the Antis' fears, so why would they not try to apply them to the most threatening places?Some of the worse places you can't carry, logic is strong with the leftist
Monday, November 21, 2022 |
order .Order Mon 11/21 5:15 PM MINUTE ORDER: The parties' briefing on Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction, Dkt.6 , raises a substantial question about whether Plaintiffs have standing to bring this challenge in light of the D.C. Circuit's decisions in Parker v. District of Columbia , 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007) and Seegars v. Gonzales , 396 F.3d 1248 (D.C. Cir. 2005). The motion hearing scheduled in this matter for December 12, 2022, at 2:00 p.m. will, accordingly, focus on the threshold jurisdictional question of standing, including whether Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success with respect to standing and whether the Court should dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. If necessary, the Court will schedule a further hearing to address whether Plaintiffs have shown that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their constitutional challenge and, if so, whether they are entitled to preliminary relief. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/21/2022. (lcrdm3) ![]() ANGELO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (1:22-cv-01878), District Of Columbia District CourtANGELO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (1:22-cv-01878), District Of Columbia District Court, Filed: 06/30/2022
![]() |
The prohibition of firearms on Metro is a DC statute not a Metro reg .I have been told but have no proof that Metro asked DC to include them in the list of prohibited locations.
So glad the little thugs read and obey laws.
Mr Heller will be along shortly to straighten DC out like he did with the carry ammo limit
It is my understanding that for the current lawsuit DC asked WMATA to help defend the status quo and WMATA told them NFW, this is all you guys.
It is my understanding that for the current lawsuit DC asked WMATA to help defend the status quo and WMATA told them NFW, this is all you guys.
I believe WMATA would have a difficult time explaining their advocacy for such restrictions in one jurisdiction (DC) and not advocating for similar restrictions in adjacent jurisdictions (MD & VA). I believe they wisely chose to stay out of the (lost cause) battle.
Monday, December 12, 2022 |
minutes Motion Hearing Mon 12/12 5:04 PM Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Randolph D. Moss: Motion Hearing held on 12/12/2022 re:6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by TYLER YZAGUIRRE, CAMERON M. ERICKSON, ROBERT M. MILLER, GREGORY T. ANGELO. Matter taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. (Court Reporter: Jeff Hook.) (kt) |
Amtrak is quasi government and they do have their own police department.