ATF Coming After Firearms with Stabilizing Braces

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • outrider58

    Semi-Retired Grouch
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    43,881
    Only if you hold them up to your shoulder.

    The tennis balls on my, um, pistols … are there so my service Labrador will be happy fetching my gun for me in an emergency.
    ...then you'll want to remove them before any possible boating mishap...
     

    TinCuda

    Sky Captain
    Apr 26, 2016
    1,289
    Texas
    I have heard some folks say that they will not comply with the new pistol brace rule.

    I believe it's important to note that those same people that have pistol braces HAVE BEEN COMPLYING! Had they not, they would have had regular stocks all along. Making felons of folks who have been TRYING TO FOLLOW THE LAW is nothing short of heinous.

    It's not my point to expose hypocrisy in the shooting community, it's my point to express the ATF's despotic fail of honor.
     
    Last edited:

    danimalw

    Active Member
    I have heard some folks say that they will not comply with the new pistol brace rule.

    I believe it's important to note that those same people that have pistol braces HAVE BEEN COMPLYING! Had they not, they would have had regular stocks all along. Making felons of folks TRYING TO FOLLOW THE LAW is nothing short of heinous.

    It's not my point to expose hypocrisy in the shooting community, it's my point to express the ATF's despotic fail of honor.
    Not picking a fight, just that I disagree about the complying..

    the people that had braces on firearms were abiding by the law (had they put stocks on, would have violated that law).. ATF isn't changing the law (passed by Congress), but instead ATF is implementing a rule and changing the definitions in the law (that they do not have authority to do so). So those that say that they will not comply with new rule are technically are still following the law that was passed by Congress.

    I agree and I think we all agree what the ATF is attempting is heinous.
     

    Kharn

    Active Member
    Mar 9, 2008
    3,550
    Hazzard County

    TinCuda

    Sky Captain
    Apr 26, 2016
    1,289
    Texas
    Although the NRA has had a dubious reputation lately, they have committed to support SB Tactical financially and with lawyers to provide legal aid.
     

    fishgutzy

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 25, 2022
    471
    AA County
    Only if you hold them up to your shoulder.

    The tennis balls on my, um, pistols … are there so my service Labrador will be happy fetching my gun for me in an emergency.
    Then there is also the stand up gimbal belt for fishing. Strap to the shoulder.
     

    wbw2123

    Member
    Nov 19, 2012
    888
    The final rule is available for public inspection on the Federal Register. This is the last step before it is officially published tomorrow.
    Thanks for the updates.

    If you've already got title I braced pistols on a 77r and in a trust, what's the downside to getting a free stamp for guns they already know about? Seems to me registration of 100million sbr would put them squarely in the common use category and offer another avenue to challenge the nfa?
     

    bmorestance

    Junior Member
    Dec 2, 2013
    40
    It seems that most of y'all wont even be able to register in MD due to the 29" OAL.
    What you thinking of that? Most of the AR Pistols I see are 7.5" and 10.5" barrels.
    Plus with the 12.5/13.5 LOP, I dont think many will get through.
    Some builds will be good depending on how its setup.
    Let the wind come through.
     
    Last edited:

    outrider58

    Semi-Retired Grouch
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    43,881
    It seems that most of y'all wont even be able to register in MD due to the 29" OAL.
    What you thinking of that? Most of the AR Pistols I see are 7.5" and 10.5" barrels.
    Plus with the 12.5 LOP, I dont think many will get through.
    Some builds will be good depending on how its setup.
    Let the wind come through.
    A 10.5" barrel will work now with the advent of extended buttbads and longer buffer tubes, at least as far as AR-PCs go.

    As for 12.5" LOPs go, if that is the average for braces, what kind of knucklehead is going to keep a pistol brace on a legal SBR?
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,540
    Political refugee in WV
    It seems that most of y'all wont even be able to register in MD due to the 29" OAL.
    What you thinking of that? Most of the AR Pistols I see are 7.5" and 10.5" barrels.
    Plus with the 12.5 LOP, I dont think many will get through.
    Some builds will be good depending on how its setup.
    Let the wind come through.
    7.5" won't. 10.5" with a 6 position buffer tube and a Magpul CTR will get over 29" OAL. Once you have the stamp, you can put a stock on it.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,540
    Political refugee in WV
    It seems that most of y'all wont even be able to register in MD due to the 29" OAL.
    What you thinking of that? Most of the AR Pistols I see are 7.5" and 10.5" barrels.
    Plus with the 12.5 LOP, I dont think many will get through.
    Some builds will be good depending on how its setup.
    Let the wind come through.
    7.5" won't. 10.5" with a 6 position buffer tube and a Magpul CTR will get over 29" OAL. Once you have the stamp, you can put a stock on it.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    23,540
    Political refugee in WV
    It seems that most of y'all wont even be able to register in MD due to the 29" OAL.
    What you thinking of that? Most of the AR Pistols I see are 7.5" and 10.5" barrels.
    Plus with the 12.5 LOP, I dont think many will get through.
    Some builds will be good depending on how its setup.
    Let the wind come through.
    7.5" won't. 10.5" with a 6 position buffer tube and a Magpul CTR will get over 29" OAL. Once you have the stamp, you can put a stock on it.
     

    wbw2123

    Member
    Nov 19, 2012
    888
    Sure, some braced pistols are currently non-compliant with the 29" law. Let's look at the likelyhood of certain events happening.

    1. Another forbearance of tax. We haven't seen this on any large scale since the machine gun amnesty. Odds of it happening again are slim to none.

    2. The nfa is abolished. Nope... Big nope, I hope but certainly don't expect this to happen in my lifetime, though a couple hundred million sbr would go a long way to making the common use argument under Heller and Bruen for a court court battle to eliminate sbr.

    3. The rule is struck. Are they going to rescind the forbearance stamps and cancel pending form 1's submitted during that period? Maybe, or maybe they leave the submissions and approvals on the books anyway as it would be a pain to do otherwise.

    4. The courts rule against Maryland's 29" rule. It may take a few years, but this seems like an inevitability under Bruen. We've waited a decade since 2013 for winds to be in our favor and after another donation to MSI I'm feeling that this is more likely than not.

    So where does that leave a descending brace afficiando? Certain you can file under forbearance and include a compliant length that you intend to make sure sbr. File with possession, remove the brace, add a cap, and when the form 1 is approved decide to either modify to 29" or leave it as a non-braced pistol awaiting the removal of the 29" rule.

    The other options are F-the-ATF with full non compliance or remove the brace. If you're going to remove the brace anyway, and it's already on a 77r, they know you have it, why not file for the free stamp?

    I'm by no means anything kind of expert and certainly leery of free candy, but this feels like we're going to probably win in the long run either way. It's just too egregious. We'll have to wait for the interpretations when they publish, but maybe a couple dozen free stamps would make you feel better about all this BS and help provide standing to further reclaim our rights.

    I dunno, I haven't made up my mind but will definitely try to position myself to have all options available over the next 120 days.
     
    Last edited:

    5string

    Junior Member
    Feb 21, 2014
    92
    NC
    Sure, some braced pistols are currently non-compliant with the 29" law. Let's look at the likelyhood of certain events happening.

    1. Another forbearance of tax. We haven't seen this on any large scale since the machine gun amnesty. Odds of it happening again are slim to none.

    2. The nfa is abolished. Nope... Big nope, I hope but certainly don't expect this to happen in my lifetime, though a couple hundred million sbr would go a long way to making the common use argument under Heller and Bruen for a court court battle to eliminate sbr.

    3. The rule is struck. Are they going to rescind the forbearance stamps and cancel pending form 1's submitted during that period? Maybe, or maybe they leave the submissions and approvals on the books anyway as it would be a pain to do otherwise.

    4. The courts rule against Maryland's 29" rule. It may take a few years, but this seems like an inevitability under Bruen. We've waited a decade since 2013 for winds to be in our favor and after another donation to MSI I'm feeling that this is more likely than not.

    So where does that leave a descending brace afficiando? Certain you can file under forbearance and include a compliant length that you intend to make sure sbr. File with possession, remove the brace, add a cap, and when the form 1 is approved decide to either modify to 29" or leave it as a non-braced pistol awaiting the removal of the 29" rule.

    The other options are F-the-ATF with full non compliance or remove the brace. If you're going to remove the brace anyway, and it's already on a 77r, they know you have it, why not file for the free stamp?

    I'm by no means anything kind of expert and certainly leery of free candy, but this feels like we're going to probably win in the long run either way. It's just too egregious. We'll have to wait for the interpretations when they publish, but maybe a couple dozen free stamps would make you feel better about all this BS and help provide standing to further reclaim our rights.

    I dunno, I haven't made up my mind but will definitely try to position myself to have all options available over the next 120 days.
    One option is gone as soon as the rule is in the registry. To get the free stamp for a pistol owned by a trust, the trust must have owned the gun prior to the final rule hitting the registry.
     

    wbw2123

    Member
    Nov 19, 2012
    888
    One option is gone as soon as the rule is in the registry. To get the free stamp for a pistol owned by a trust, the trust must have owned the gun prior to the final rule hitting the registry.
    Yes, that's true, but it's been forecast for weeks (even with the misrepresentation of when the trust must own the firearms) so anyone that wanted to could have gotten their title I stuff into a revocable trust. I'm not necessarily endorsing this, but there are plenty of free and $60 online trusts out there that would get you over the line if you didn't already have one. You can always use a local estate attorney to rewrite the trust later for better protection and compliance. The AFT doesn't care, they just want proof of the trust existence and the possession of the firearms before the rule. They don't analyze the trust for legality and largely don't care if you, within the law, rewrite it the day after your stamp arrives.

    For that matter, if you're friends with a notary you probably have another 12 hours to do just that.
     

    5string

    Junior Member
    Feb 21, 2014
    92
    NC
    Yes, that's true, but it's been forecast for weeks (even with the misrepresentation of when the trust must own the firearms) so anyone that wanted to could have gotten their title I stuff into a revocable trust. I'm not necessarily endorsing this, but there are plenty of free and $60 online trusts out there that would get you over the line if you didn't already have one. You can always use a local estate attorney to rewrite the trust later for better protection and compliance. The AFT doesn't care, they just want proof of the trust existence and the possession of the firearms before the rule. They don't analyze the trust for legality and largely don't care if you, within the law, rewrite it the day after your stamp arrives.

    For that matter, if you're friends with a notary you probably have another 12 hours to do just that.
    The only notary I knew that would have done that was buried about 4 years ago so I had to get my stuff done before the deadline.
     

    wbw2123

    Member
    Nov 19, 2012
    888
    Well you still have 12 hours until the deadline. They are publishing it tomorrow- the draft was posted today.
     

    5string

    Junior Member
    Feb 21, 2014
    92
    NC
    Well you still have 12 hours until the deadline. They are publishing it tomorrow- the draft was posted today.
    That's why I posted what I did. I thought there might be someone who didn't know. My stuff has been sent in already.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    267,993
    Messages
    6,946,165
    Members
    31,901
    Latest member
    Derek924

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom