A refund from the government for an SBR? LOLI think I can SBR three lowers (for free) then once in hand/email/approved ask for a refund for three current SBR's and swap parts while waiting for a check! I have recieved refunds in the past for various reasons, it's easy.
I think anyone with a current SBR can get a refund this way??
The rule hasn't been filed yet so the free tax stamp might not work yet. I'd hold off until it's filed.This a probably gonna get me flamed, but I have been contemplating an SBR for a while. Should I go ahead and take advantage of the BS right now, or wait to see how things play out in court and file the old fashioned way?
That was a mistake that has since been corrected. Now, it must be in the trust before the rule goes into the federal registry.5string, If the trust is going to register it, it needed to be in the trust before last week (not when the rule is published in the register.) The rule clearly states that date. If you didnt already have the pistol in your trust, you will have to register it as an individual if you want to do it tax free.
I can't answer why but that is the way it is.Why is that? What if I don't have a trust?
You want to talk about some irony?What they are saying is all of these "rifles" with barrels less than 16" with any kind of "accessories" on the end of the rifle including braces are sbrs and need to have a tax stamp like they have always needed. You can either take the "accessories" off or convert it to a non sbr. But if you want to have the sbr then you have to get a tax stamp and the atf will give it to you for free because they are nice. The atf gave options other than registering them on a form1.
Until someone challenges the nfa in court and says that sbrs are in "common use" and are "not unusual and dangerous" then the nfa will be law of land as passed in 1934.
I agree this is bs. Its moving the goal posts after they ruled one way. You are right whats the point there 10 to 40 million out there anyway for over 10 years. To me It also shows the nfa and sbrs and not anymore dangerous than any other type of firearm. And they shouldn't be regulated by the nfa.
It's the gun control lobby putting pressure on biden to "do something" biden got campaign money from them. he has to do something for them. This is probably the only thing the executive branch can do. They can re write definitions via atf rules. The question does he and the atf have the power. The courts will have to decide.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
get one silencershop does them as a service.