camo556
Ultimate Member
- Aug 29, 2021
- 2,634
So this one is a head scratcher for sure.
I can see rescheduling one until the other is ready. I agree this is a head scratcher now. Unless there is a third case I am not thinking of.
So this one is a head scratcher for sure.
There are at least 3 and maybe up to 6 more bump stock cases in the lower court levels, district and circuit. If my memory is on target.I can see rescheduling one until the other is ready. I agree this is a head scratcher now. Unless there is a third case I am not thinking of.
We kind of know why based on the Guedes v ATF caseThat’s too bad. I wish we knew why.
Yeah it wasn't realistic to expect SCOTUS to grant cert for a PI issue over tangible personal property.We kind of know why based on the Guedes v ATF case
both of these cases (Aposhian and GOA) were interlocutory petitions based on denials of a preliminary injunction rather than final judgment. Additionally other courts are actively considering challenges to the same regulation.
Thank you!We kind of know why based on the Guedes v ATF case
both of these cases (Aposhian and GOA) were interlocutory petitions based on denials of a preliminary injunction rather than final judgment. Additionally other courts are actively considering challenges to the same regulation.
Worth a watch...perhaps SCOTUS is playing a longer game. (not sure what's going on with Mark's hair...maybe just out of the shower).