Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 29th, 2011, 02:53 PM #1
rambling_one's Avatar
rambling_one rambling_one is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 4,532
Images: 1
rambling_one rambling_one is offline
Senior Member
rambling_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 4,532
Images: 1
Ben Cardin Reads the Tea Leaves

Thank you for writing to me regarding gun control.

In June 2008 the Supreme Court decided the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. The Court analyzed the meaning of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual rather than a collective right to possess a firearm. The Court also held that this Second Amendment right is not unlimited, and it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner for any purpose. The Court struck down as unconstitutional the District of Columbia's handgun ban and trigger-lock requirement, holding that the ban was too broad and violates an individual's right of self-defense in the home.

The impact of this complicated 64-page decision is still not clear, as the District of Columbia has a unique legal status and had one of the most restrictive gun control laws in the country. I support the right of law-abiding citizens to own and use firearms, under reasonable, common-sense regulations.

Over the next year the Maryland General Assembly and localities in Maryland will weigh what changes in law they need to make, if any, to comply with the Court's decision. Further lawsuits are likely, citing Heller, to challenge certain local and state gun control ordinances and laws.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to do so again.
__________________
Berwyn Rod & Gun Club - Life Member
MD Hunter Safety Instructor - 22 Years
MD Designated Collector
MSI Executive Member (Former Board)
SAF - Life Member
NRA - Life Member (Benefactor)
AZ, FL, MD, NH, PA, UT, VA Permits

PLEASE CONSIDER JOINING MSI

rambling_one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29th, 2011, 03:25 PM #2
QuebecoisWolf's Avatar
QuebecoisWolf QuebecoisWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Anne Arundel
Posts: 3,714
Images: 2
QuebecoisWolf QuebecoisWolf is offline
Senior Member
QuebecoisWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Anne Arundel
Posts: 3,714
Images: 2
WHAT??? Senator Cardin thinks that Heller is "unclear" and only applies to DC??? I thought that Lesson 1 in Law 101 is "Cases establish precedent, Supreme Court cases establish national precedents." Either that or Cardin thinks that legal precedent is his interpretation of the case, not the Supreme Court's.

Also, he totally lost me at "reasonable, common-sense regulations."
QuebecoisWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29th, 2011, 03:35 PM #3
md_rick_o's Avatar
md_rick_o md_rick_o is offline
MSI EM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Severn Md.
Posts: 3,924
Images: 2
md_rick_o md_rick_o is offline
MSI EM
md_rick_o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Severn Md.
Posts: 3,924
Images: 2
In my opinion this guy is an idiot and so is anyone that votes for him.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
md_rick_o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29th, 2011, 03:48 PM #4
Inigoes's Avatar
Inigoes Inigoes is offline
Head'n for the hills
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoMD / West PA
Posts: 36,337
Inigoes Inigoes is offline
Head'n for the hills
Inigoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoMD / West PA
Posts: 36,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuebecoisWolf View Post
WHAT??? Senator Cardin thinks that Heller is "unclear" and only applies to DC??? I thought that Lesson 1 in Law 101 is "Cases establish precedent, Supreme Court cases establish national precedents." Either that or Cardin thinks that legal precedent is his interpretation of the case, not the Supreme Court's.
You know how to make a convincing lie, blend in some truth, Right???

It was true, that Heller only applied to DC and the federal jurisdictions. Notice how he omitted McDonald which incorporated the 2A against the states...

Typical progressive double speak!

edit: Ben probably doesn't like AG Gansler's comment, that long rifle carry is legal...
__________________
Life is tough, life is tougher when you are stupid.
Inigoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29th, 2011, 05:30 PM #5
Sirex's Avatar
Sirex Sirex is offline
Powered by natural gas
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 5,274
Sirex Sirex is offline
Powered by natural gas
Sirex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 5,274
All laws are typically unclear and enforced with bias by the executive and judicial branches.
__________________
A student said to the master in the garden, "You teach me fighting, but talk about peace. How do you reconcile the two?"

The master replied, "It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener in a war."
Sirex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30th, 2011, 02:33 AM #6
pcfixer's Avatar
pcfixer pcfixer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marylandstan
Posts: 4,074
pcfixer pcfixer is offline
Senior Member
pcfixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Marylandstan
Posts: 4,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by rambling_one View Post
Thank you for writing to me regarding gun control.

In June 2008 the Supreme Court decided the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. The Court analyzed the meaning of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual rather than a collective right to possess a firearm. The Court also held that this Second Amendment right is not unlimited, and it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner for any purpose. The Court struck down as unconstitutional the District of Columbia's handgun ban and trigger-lock requirement, holding that the ban was too broad and violates an individual's right of self-defense in the home.

The impact of this complicated 64-page decision is still not clear, as the District of Columbia has a unique legal status and had one of the most restrictive gun control laws in the country. I support the right of law-abiding citizens to own and use firearms, under reasonable, common-sense regulations.

Over the next year the Maryland General Assembly and localities in Maryland will weigh what changes in law they need to make, if any, to comply with the Court's decision. Further lawsuits are likely, citing Heller, to challenge certain local and state gun control ordinances and laws.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to do so again.
Cardin is NOT a 2A advocate. I got this same letter over a year ago.
Wonder why the NRA gives Cardin a F rating!
__________________
Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.

“By the way I call it "moral obedience" rather than "civil disobedience" because compiling with God's law can never be "disobedient". Those who try to promote un-natural laws on us are committing moral disobedience. It is our duty to resist immoral laws and actions.” By Richard Fry.
pcfixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30th, 2011, 06:24 AM #7
LongTom LongTom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 212
LongTom LongTom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 212
Translation -

"We will see how bulletproof Maryland's current gun laws are. Over the next year we will examine how Heller will affect current laws and attempt to either come up with a good court defense for them or change them in some subtle way in order to keep the same or greater level of restriction on the serfs

...Oh and blah blah blah nobody really read your hand written letter anyways so here's a canned response that doesn't really say anything to nail down my official position on this issue"
LongTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2011, 11:44 PM #8
gprimr1's Avatar
gprimr1 gprimr1 is online now
Former MSI BOD
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,355
Images: 4
gprimr1 gprimr1 is online now
Former MSI BOD
gprimr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 19,355
Images: 4
Quote:
Over the next year the Maryland General Assembly and localities in Maryland will weigh what changes in law they need to make, if any, to comply with the Court's decision. Further lawsuits are likely, citing Heller, to challenge certain local and state gun control ordinances and laws.
AKA

Shit, we are probably going to get our discriminatory and arbitrary law nullified by the courts so how can we go back and make sure that the requirements for Shall Issue are so astronomical that we will have to go back to court to defend them at your expense.
__________________
2018
gprimr1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2011, 07:57 AM #9
Llyrin's Avatar
Llyrin Llyrin is offline
Yankee-Rebel
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charles Co
Posts: 2,527
Llyrin Llyrin is offline
Yankee-Rebel
Llyrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charles Co
Posts: 2,527
I think he was being the typical politician and said...nothing. We can infer a lot, and being MD, we can infer a worst-case scenario, but in the end, he said nothing. Might as well have not sent a reply at all.
__________________
Llyrin
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
NRA Benefactor-Golden Eagle
Collector of Curios & Relics
Maryland Designated Colector
Member: MSI, Heritage Foundation, Judicial Watch



Think about it: I'm left-handed, so I'm in my right mind. The rest of you are governed by the left.

God only gave the Irish whiskey to prevent us from taking over the world.
Llyrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2011, 02:46 PM #10
JOBU JOBU is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: STALAG Montgomery
Posts: 5,423
JOBU JOBU is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: STALAG Montgomery
Posts: 5,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by rambling_one View Post
.....I support the right of law-abiding citizens to own and use firearms, under reasonable, common-sense regulations.
I wonder how the Senator would feel if we were to put under reasonable review, and common-sense regulation, the "....establishment of [Senator's Cardin's own*] religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."?

* Let's just set the record straight: Senator Cardin is not a member of the Church of Scotland.


   
JOBU is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2017, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service