I believe you are corect. This was from a case where a student was arrested for having a butter knife:You COULD claim that a Leatherman is actually a "tool" and unlike, say, a Bowie knife, based on it's "intended purpose." But I wouldn't push the envelope if it was me.
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache...ool&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-aAccordingly, we hold that in order to convict a person of
carrying or possessing any rifle, gun, or knife on school property
under Art. 27, § 36A, the State must show that the instrument
possessed can, under the circumstances of the case, reasonably be
considered a deadly weapon. This objective approach is in keeping
with the legislative intent to prohibit the possessing and carrying
of deadly weapons on public school property and will avoid the
regular violation of that statute by students, teachers, and staff
who are engaged in the routine performance of their duties at the
public schools.
So, since they did not ban loaded rifles I say we go down there and walk around with them just to prove a point.Friendship Heights banned all handguns and handgun parts within that 100 yard "safety zone," with the thinking that the entire village was covered by one safety zone or another.
According to the Tripwire guys, Takoma Park's "safety zone handgun ban" is to be interpreted so that sidewalks are "places of public assembly" - with no "home exemption."
I still think that the FH law is moot due to 5-133. Be interesting if someone tested it like mowing their lawn with a handgun. The law only carries a fine.