Ghost Guns Amended to SB 190 in House Committee

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • MJD438

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2012
    5,853
    Somewhere in MD
    The House amended out the entirety of the canibis legislation and it is now just about ghost guns... Kipke is going to try amendments tomorrow in floor session.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
     

    lazarus

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 23, 2015
    13,726
    The House amended out the entirety of the canibis legislation and it is now just about ghost guns... Kipke is going to try amendments tomorrow in floor session.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

    I perhaps missed this, but has the senate taken it up? Or had the senate passed the original cannabis bill and the house decided to strip out the cannabis language in their companion bill and just insert the ghost gun language and, see, we both passed the bill. Now reconcile it so the senate strips out the cannabis language and inserts our ghost gun language and everyone re-vote.

    I guess I've been having a slow day or two as I didn't entirely understand what the drama was with the senate side of the equation.
     

    MJD438

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2012
    5,853
    Somewhere in MD
    I perhaps missed this, but has the senate taken it up? Or had the senate passed the original cannabis bill and the house decided to strip out the cannabis language in their companion bill and just insert the ghost gun language and, see, we both passed the bill. Now reconcile it so the senate strips out the cannabis language and inserts our ghost gun language and everyone re-vote.



    I guess I've been having a slow day or two as I didn't entirely understand what the drama was with the senate side of the equation.
    I'll answer this when I get to a real keyboard.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,148
    Anne Arundel County
    The House amended out the entirety of the canibis legislation and it is now just about ghost guns... Kipke is going to try amendments tomorrow in floor session.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

    Well, they did solve the "one bill, one issue" problem that way. :sad20:
     

    MJD438

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2012
    5,853
    Somewhere in MD
    History of the current situation:

    1. SB0190 is presented as a repeat of the same bill from prior years.
    2. SB0190 is heard in JPR.
    3. SB0190 is voted out of committee (as it has been in other bill numbers over the past several years).
    4. SB0190 is voted through the Senate.
    5. SB0190 is presented to the House and assigned to JUD, where it sits for weeks with no action.
    6. With less than a couple of hours notice, the bill is amended to include a modified version of Del Lopez ghost gun bill (HB0638 - which was never voted on directly in House Judiciary) and voted out of House Judiciary.
    7. In floor debate, SB0190 has the original content (cannabis issues) completely gutted making it only the contents of HB0638 as amended.
    8. It now sits on "Special Order" so that the Republicans can try to re-amend it.
    MSRPA Speculation:

    1. All Republican amendments will be deemed "unfriendly" and soundly defeated.
    2. SB0190 (now Ghost Guns and nothing to do with cannabis) will be voted through the House on party lines.
    3. SB0190 returns to the Senate who refuses to concur on the House Amendments.
    4. Conference Committee hijinks commence.
    We can only hope that this issue irritates not only Senator Hough (the Sponsor of SB0190), but also Senator Smith (Chair of Judicial Proceedings) enough to make it die at the Conference Committee level.


    This is why I constantly say that nothing is over until the gavels fall and we have to be on our toes to respond (phone calls) during the last few days of every session.
     

    lazarus

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 23, 2015
    13,726
    History of the current situation:

    1. SB0190 is presented as a repeat of the same bill from prior years.
    2. SB0190 is heard in JPR.
    3. SB0190 is voted out of committee (as it has been in other bill numbers over the past several years).
    4. SB0190 is voted through the Senate.
    5. SB0190 is presented to the House and assigned to JUD, where it sits for weeks with no action.
    6. With less than a couple of hours notice, the bill is amended to include a modified version of Del Lopez ghost gun bill (HB0638 - which was never voted on directly in House Judiciary) and voted out of House Judiciary.
    7. In floor debate, SB0190 has the original content (cannabis issues) completely gutted making it only the contents of HB0638 as amended.
    8. It now sits on "Special Order" so that the Republicans can try to re-amend it.
    MSRPA Speculation:

    1. All Republican amendments will be deemed "unfriendly" and soundly defeated.
    2. SB0190 (now Ghost Guns and nothing to do with cannabis) will be voted through the House on party lines.
    3. SB0190 returns to the Senate who refuses to concur on the House Amendments.
    4. Conference Committee hijinks commence.
    We can only hope that this issue irritates not only Senator Hough (the Sponsor of SB0190), but also Senator Smith (Chair of Judicial Proceedings) enough to make it die at the Conference Committee level.


    This is why I constantly say that nothing is over until the gavels fall and we have to be on our toes to respond (phone calls) during the last few days of every session.

    Thanks! I really appreciate the history and your insight. I'll sure be hoping it dies. I guess why I am not in politics. I just couldn't F over coworkers like that (ignoring the voting and non-voting public part).

    If I looked at it in a rational way (and politics is not!) I'd think that, well the Senate must be on board with this. Because otherwise why the heck would the house do that? But on the other hand, as past has proven, the house often has a way to dick with things without senatorial concurrence and then I guess light some candles and hope the MD senate comes around.

    Is it like they don't talk to each other at all? Because it doesn't just seem like a good way to not get what you want, it seems like a good way to burn relationships down the road too.

    If ya'll realized too late you didn't move this thing, then it seems like you need to reach out to the relevant bill sponsor, chairperson and senate leadership and have a quick conversation with them about how to try to get it over the finish line. Not...do what they seem to have done.

    PS I also really don't see how they manage to square the bill title with the bill subject. Now they have nothing to do with each other. I guess they cured the single subject issue. That doesn't solve their constitutional issues though. I guess it is a temperature check though that even if they fail this time, they are obviously desperate to get it done and it will be back next year for sure and they'll for sure make sure it gets done.

    PPS come on midnight sine die. 77.5hrs to go.
     

    MJD438

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2012
    5,853
    Somewhere in MD
    Thanks! I really appreciate the history and your insight. I'll sure be hoping it dies. I guess why I am not in politics. I just couldn't F over coworkers like that (ignoring the voting and non-voting public part).

    If I looked at it in a rational way (and politics is not!) I'd think that, well the Senate must be on board with this. Because otherwise why the heck would the house do that? But on the other hand, as past has proven, the house often has a way to dick with things without senatorial concurrence and then I guess light some candles and hope the MD senate comes around.

    Is it like they don't talk to each other at all? Because it doesn't just seem like a good way to not get what you want, it seems like a good way to burn relationships down the road too.

    If ya'll realized too late you didn't move this thing, then it seems like you need to reach out to the relevant bill sponsor, chairperson and senate leadership and have a quick conversation with them about how to try to get it over the finish line. Not...do what they seem to have done.

    PS I also really don't see how they manage to square the bill title with the bill subject. Now they have nothing to do with each other. I guess they cured the single subject issue. That doesn't solve their constitutional issues though. I guess it is a temperature check though that even if they fail this time, they are obviously desperate to get it done and it will be back next year for sure and they'll for sure make sure it gets done.

    PPS come on midnight sine die. 77.5hrs to go.
    Hence the reason we euphemistically call it sausage-making, of really stinky tripe.


    The two Chambers (House of Delegates and Senate) are, like all bicameral legislatures, setup to be an adversarial process, requiring negotiation and compromise.


    The title is tentatively changed as a result of the House Floor Amendments today - "Untraceable and Undetectable Firearms - Purchase and Possession", but that will not reflect on the MGALEG website unless those amendments are accepted by the Senate if/when it returns to them following House voting actions.



    To me (CONJECTURE WARNING - no evidence to offer to back this up, just my best guess based on my short time being with MSRPA in my various roles): this is a result of acrimony between the members of the two judicial committees (House Judiciary & Senate Judicial Proceedings) as well as pressure from the anti-2A groups that are frustrated with the lack of movement of their pet projects over the past several years.

    Sine Die is midnight on Monday, correct?


    Yes, Sine Die (00:00:00 12APR2021 into 13APR2021) cannot come soon enough. BUT, this should remind everyone of caution - we need all hands on deck to pay attention to the Floor Sessions over the next couple of days and be ready to communicate (email and phone calls) to their Delegates and Senators on a moment's notice. We need to make this irritating for them - make their offices have to check email and work the phones.
     
    Last edited:

    Nickberg500

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 20, 2019
    1,064
    North of Baltimore County
    Hence the reason we euphemistically call it sausage-making, of really stinky tripe.


    The two Chambers (House of Delegates and Senate) are, like all bicameral legislatures, setup to be an adversarial process, requiring negotiation and compromise.


    The title is tentatively changed as a result of the House Floor Amendments today - "Untraceable and Undetectable Firearms - Purchase and Possession", but that will not reflect on the MGALEG website unless those amendments are accepted by the Senate if/when it returns to them following House voting actions.



    To me (CONJECTURE WARNING - no evidence to offer to back this up, just my best guess based on my short time being with MSRPA in my various roles): this is a result of acrimony between the members of the two judicial committees (House Judiciary & Senate Judicial Proceedings) as well as pressure from the anti-2A groups that are frustrated with the lack of movement of their pet projects over the past several years.




    Yes, Sine Die (00:00:00 12APR2021 into 13APR2021) cannot come soon enough. BUT, this should remind everyone of caution - we need all hands on deck to pay attention to the Floor Sessions over the next couple of days and be ready to communicate (email and phone calls) to their Delegates and Senators on a moment's notice. We need to make this irritating for them - make their offices have to check email and work the phones.
    Is it worth calling all of the Senators/Delegates, instead of just those in the judicial committee? I've been calling/emailing the judicial committees only.
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,688
    Columbia
    History of the current situation:

    1. SB0190 is presented as a repeat of the same bill from prior years.
    2. SB0190 is heard in JPR.
    3. SB0190 is voted out of committee (as it has been in other bill numbers over the past several years).
    4. SB0190 is voted through the Senate.
    5. SB0190 is presented to the House and assigned to JUD, where it sits for weeks with no action.
    6. With less than a couple of hours notice, the bill is amended to include a modified version of Del Lopez ghost gun bill (HB0638 - which was never voted on directly in House Judiciary) and voted out of House Judiciary.
    7. In floor debate, SB0190 has the original content (cannabis issues) completely gutted making it only the contents of HB0638 as amended.
    8. It now sits on "Special Order" so that the Republicans can try to re-amend it.
    MSRPA Speculation:

    1. All Republican amendments will be deemed "unfriendly" and soundly defeated.
    2. SB0190 (now Ghost Guns and nothing to do with cannabis) will be voted through the House on party lines.
    3. SB0190 returns to the Senate who refuses to concur on the House Amendments.
    4. Conference Committee hijinks commence.
    We can only hope that this issue irritates not only Senator Hough (the Sponsor of SB0190), but also Senator Smith (Chair of Judicial Proceedings) enough to make it die at the Conference Committee level.


    This is why I constantly say that nothing is over until the gavels fall and we have to be on our toes to respond (phone calls) during the last few days of every session.

    How in the fvck is any of this legal? They can't change the bill completely from it's original form to a totally different subject can they? (Legally speaking)
     

    mac1_131

    MSI Executive Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 31, 2009
    3,285
    History of the current situation:

    1. SB0190 is presented as a repeat of the same bill from prior years.
    2. SB0190 is heard in JPR.
    3. SB0190 is voted out of committee (as it has been in other bill numbers over the past several years).
    4. SB0190 is voted through the Senate.
    5. SB0190 is presented to the House and assigned to JUD, where it sits for weeks with no action.
    6. With less than a couple of hours notice, the bill is amended to include a modified version of Del Lopez ghost gun bill (HB0638 - which was never voted on directly in House Judiciary) and voted out of House Judiciary.
    7. In floor debate, SB0190 has the original content (cannabis issues) completely gutted making it only the contents of HB0638 as amended.
    8. It now sits on "Special Order" so that the Republicans can try to re-amend it.
    MSRPA Speculation:

    1. All Republican amendments will be deemed "unfriendly" and soundly defeated.
    2. SB0190 (now Ghost Guns and nothing to do with cannabis) will be voted through the House on party lines.
    3. SB0190 returns to the Senate who refuses to concur on the House Amendments.
    4. Conference Committee hijinks commence.
    We can only hope that this issue irritates not only Senator Hough (the Sponsor of SB0190), but also Senator Smith (Chair of Judicial Proceedings) enough to make it die at the Conference Committee level.


    This is why I constantly say that nothing is over until the gavels fall and we have to be on our toes to respond (phone calls) during the last few days of every session.
    And this is what people like Kevin Kelly (pro-gun D) always warned us about getting a concealed carry bill passed. It would be amended into an anti-gun bill in exactly the same way.

    The arrogance of today's super-majority in the MGA knows no bounds. They have no conscience, no morals, no shame, no honor, and don't give a crap what you think. They lie fluently and seamlessly.

    Ask me how I really feel.

    Sad.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,137
    Nah , this is only Final Week Shenanigans , wait until the actual Final Evening Shenanigans .
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    49,984
    The "calendar" was not acted upon, so they are apparently holding it for potential Sine Die shenanigans tomorrow.

    Has there ever been a state more eager to give away its individual rights? Disgusting! Can't wait to transfer out of this chicken-shit state.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,389
    Messages
    7,279,670
    Members
    33,445
    Latest member
    ESM07

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom