- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,964
he did not go to the police but actually followed the law and went to a magistrate and provided the needed information to convince a magistrate. Do you really think a magistrate or a judge would issue an ERPO on heresay?
She presumably provided commentary, her personal "feelings" about her BIL. The magistrate has no way of ascertaining the truth of what she may have said. Magistrates typically provide various restraining orders based on one person's statements. I doubt that the magistrate in question had sufficient knowledge to make any sort of factual determination. I also doubt that the magistrate had full knowledge of the extent of deial of due process in the ERPO legislation to understand the gravity of the situation he was empowering.
Seems to me the SIL's "testimony" is nothing more than "he said/she said" which is pretty much hearsay in my understanding of the term. Couple that with the legislative exclusion covering any reporters' possible perjury in presenting their side of the story (and by "story" I mean "fiction devised for an underhanded purpose") and you have a perfect storm of unconstitutional actions.