DanGuy48
Ultimate Member
Maryland, “The Free State”. Someone’s sense of irony has turned into pure cynicism.
SAF launches new lawsuite against New Jersey
- Thread starter motorcoachdoug
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Maryland, “The Free State”. Someone’s sense of irony has turned into pure cynicism.
Good. As always, thanks for your informative posts.
KingClown
SOmething Witty
The jeep is something my wife and I built. I am now a widow and its something we loved together. I think Ill keep it. It doesnt need fixed its on 37s its built for rock crawling. I will probably just end up using a family memebers address and keeping MD tags on it. Id much rather see scotus spank MD, NJ, NY, CA, IL and the others
NewTwo
Member
- Jan 10, 2020
- 55
Let's hope this gets to SCOTUS. The next step for the 2A is establishing its existence outside of the home.
I think even the most liberal of courts have basically accepted this premise. The issue is that they believe it's OK to ration it to the point where as long as someone gets a carry permit, or in the case of Hawaii where it's someday possible that someone gets a permit, that it satisfies the 2A.
wjackcooper
Active Member
- Feb 9, 2011
- 689
Bennett (N.J. carry) Heller v. interest – balancing:
Heller’s text, history & tradition test is the basic approach in Bennett and in most pending 2A litigation.* Our adversaries (including Democrat Judicial appointees) can be expected to counter with balancing the 2A v. public safety. Manipulating the plain language in Heller, while using interest – balancing via intermediate scrutiny to validate “gun control” is the technique most often used by the judiciary to neuter the 2A in lower courts. **
David Jenson succinctly sums up the right to “carry.” ***
In the end, if the 2A (cornerstone of the Constitution) is reinforced . . . Americans will owe Donald Trump. ****
Regards
Jack
* https://www.firearmspolicy.org/legal
**Scroll down past page 21 to Judge Matey’s decent, then see pages 30 through 32:
https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/193142p.pdf
*** David Jenson, Complaint in Bennett, see para(s). 71 through 80.
https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.n...6/2020-11-02-Bennett-Complaint.pdf?1604334776
**** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_... December 1, 2020,for the United States Court
“As of December 1, 2020, the United States Senate has confirmed 229 Article III judges nominated by Trump: three associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 53 judges for the United States courts of appeals, 170 judges for the United States district courts . . . .”
Heller’s text, history & tradition test is the basic approach in Bennett and in most pending 2A litigation.* Our adversaries (including Democrat Judicial appointees) can be expected to counter with balancing the 2A v. public safety. Manipulating the plain language in Heller, while using interest – balancing via intermediate scrutiny to validate “gun control” is the technique most often used by the judiciary to neuter the 2A in lower courts. **
David Jenson succinctly sums up the right to “carry.” ***
In the end, if the 2A (cornerstone of the Constitution) is reinforced . . . Americans will owe Donald Trump. ****
Regards
Jack
* https://www.firearmspolicy.org/legal
**Scroll down past page 21 to Judge Matey’s decent, then see pages 30 through 32:
https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/193142p.pdf
*** David Jenson, Complaint in Bennett, see para(s). 71 through 80.
https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.n...6/2020-11-02-Bennett-Complaint.pdf?1604334776
**** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_... December 1, 2020,for the United States Court
“As of December 1, 2020, the United States Senate has confirmed 229 Article III judges nominated by Trump: three associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 53 judges for the United States courts of appeals, 170 judges for the United States district courts . . . .”
Defies reason that government should be able to qualitatively ration anything leave alone a right? Even an effing hair dresser has quantitative requirements they have to meet and then a license is granted (not that I believe you should need a license for that either)... Is there even one other example aside from CCW where someone can give an example of the government qualitatively deciding who is eligible for something?
Last edited:
I can't think of one. That's why the legal gymnastics will be fun to watch.
- Nov 11, 2009
- 30,953
They're protecting the populace from bad haircuts.
The government decided that it has the job of protecting us from ourselves, and interfering in our lives to the extent that we fail to live up to Karen's standards. They know what we need, and they'll make it mandatory. They knw what we shouldn't want, and they will ban it.
Where would we be without the government to take care of us?
Last edited:
Defense Rifle
Active Member
States like MD, NJ should be required to accept conceal carry permits from other states, at least residential permits. Ridiculous how some states like to inconvenience law abiding US citizens.
It’s those gymnastics that got us in this pickle.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
3rd Circuit Case - Range v Atty General Non-Violent Misdemeanor as a Prohibitor (7 Viewers)- Latest: Inigoes
-
MDS Team Building. Intro to Pistol AND Rifle with Ninja. July 27&28 Clear Run, NC. (5 Viewers)
- Latest: 4g64loser
