Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,252
As to open/ concealed in Md , there have been several threads.
There is no statutory distinction between open and concealed. Pre-Wollard there was no precieved need for the State to do so , as the permits could be administrativly revoked. Unless worn openly by person in recognizable uniform , or in obviously hunting or sporting situation expect a high likelyhood of revokation for * causing feeling of alarm to public * , if not being charged with disorderly conduct. All speaking pre-Wollard. After Woolard is upheld expect *interesting times * . Visualize MSP still thinking it's the Bad Old Days, and they can revoke at will. Expect Civil Rights lawsuit when they do so .
There is no statutory distinction between open and concealed. Pre-Wollard there was no precieved need for the State to do so , as the permits could be administrativly revoked. Unless worn openly by person in recognizable uniform , or in obviously hunting or sporting situation expect a high likelyhood of revokation for * causing feeling of alarm to public * , if not being charged with disorderly conduct. All speaking pre-Wollard. After Woolard is upheld expect *interesting times * . Visualize MSP still thinking it's the Bad Old Days, and they can revoke at will. Expect Civil Rights lawsuit when they do so .
