Leupold
Leupold
I have 1000's of rounds under multiple M-308 scopes. It's because I do some PR work for Nikon that I have this many rounds under my scopes. They have functioned flawlessly. I usually use the BDC 800 reticle because I never know what kind of ammo I will have access too. The bDC let's me use Nikon's Spot On Ballistic Program to really dial in longrange shots. The better the info the more accurate your shots will be. Measuring appropriate scope height is also important, mid-scope to mid-more. Enter that with accurate MV and you are GTG !
In case you were not aware these scopes are currently under a PROMO Nikon is having right now. Pretty nice discount at check out when you buy from a participating dealer. I always get asked and I appreciate it, but I don't do any sales for Nikon. I suggest supporting those who support this site, everyone wins. Here's a pic of my 78 year old Father In-Law using the M-308 4-16 BDC 800 scopes on a AR and Bolt rifle.
Coworker got a vortex for his 308, sucka hasn't even sighted in yet bc no indoor range allows 308.
I would buy a weaver grand slam over a leupold, but that's just me.
You can buy a Zeiss for a lot less than a Leupold with the same features.
... nikon is running the $100 instant savings and they include a mount which I would assume is decent.
If its anything like their AR15 mount I wouldn't make that assumption. The design of those is flawed. The base is three parts. The center that holds the scope and the rail clamps on both sides. This allows the center part to move side to side (twist) on the rail as you tighten it down. The two side clamps do NOT hold it straight. Repeatability is non-existent. You'll have to bore sight it as you tighten them down so the scope doesn't run out of windage adjustment. If you reef down on the bolts enough if will stay put but a mount that has one half of the picatinny rail clamp machined as part of the main part (so it only has a moving clamp on one side) is a MUCH better design.