SNIP What made Cheeseman and Jillard different than the cases that came before him: Drake, Pantano, Peruta, et.al. Cheeseman’s second go at obtaining a permit to carry in the Garden State was not challenging the statute but challenging the definition of justifiable need. In their arguments, the injury claim is one that revolves around the formerly cited Heller case. In Heller, it was stated that when concerning a Constitutional Right, something called interest balancing cannot be done. What does that mean? That means that a right cannot be granted to individuals on a case by case basis. To fulfill the justifiable need statute, the original definition was such that “all lawful purposes” would meet this requirement. Not the case in New Jersey. SNIP OFF
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/06/ch...ail&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-64989da443-21267421
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/06/ch...ail&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-64989da443-21267421