Nichols v. Brown - New CA Open-Carry Civil Rights Lawsuit Filed

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    swinokur

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,475
    Westminster USA
    Charles Nichols is an arrogant prick. He joined here and was promptly banned.

    He is also not very popular over on OCDO, with good reason.
     
    Last edited:
    Inigoes

    Inigoes

    Head'n for the hills
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 21, 2008
    49,557
    SoMD / West PA
    swinokur said:
    Charles Nichols is an arrogant prick. He joined here and was promptly banned.

    He is also not very popular over on OCDO, with good reason.
    Click to expand...

    Always remember, the case is important, he isn't.

    If he loses open carry, "bear" is written out of the 2A.
     
    Last edited:
    P

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,916
    WV
    Panel for orals is up:
    2018-02-15 9:00 am Courtroom 3, Richard H. Chambers US Court of Appeals, Pasadena


    Before: BERZON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and GLEASON (Alaska), District Judge
     
    P

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,916
    WV
    But it would seem there's only 2 scenarios here, either the open carry law is struck down or the 9th essentially goes out on their own and proclaims the right is home-bound.

    Neither of which would be a bad thing.
     
    G

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    press1280 said:
    But it would seem there's only 2 scenarios here, either the open carry law is struck down or the 9th essentially goes out on their own and proclaims the right is home-bound.

    Neither of which would be a bad thing.
    Click to expand...

    Or more likely that they'll declare that there is a right, but that the intermediate "two step" scrutiny allows it to be denied to nearly everyone.
     
    P

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,916
    WV
    danb said:
    Or they decide there is some procedural flaw and punt. Never know with the 9th.
    Click to expand...

    The state has basically conceded on that point. You can bet they'd love nothing more than to have this Sent back to the district court and waste another 2 years.
     
    P

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,916
    WV
    Bump

    Arguments at CA9 right now, Nichols is not up yet. I can't link right now but Google 9th circuit live stream and click on the Pasadena link, it'll have judges Bybee, Berzon, and Gleason.
     
    Fox123

    Fox123

    Ultimate Member
    May 21, 2012
    3,931
    Rosedale, MD
    Now I see why calguns.net were pissed at this guy.... horrible argument and may set the stage to go backwards with their rights in CA...
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Scott's Gunsmithing banner ad

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,504
    Messages
    7,284,569
    Members
    33,472
    Latest member
    SrAIC

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom