Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 13th, 2009, 07:31 AM #1
2SAM22's Avatar
2SAM22 2SAM22 is offline


Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,044
Images: 6
2SAM22 2SAM22 is offline


Moderator
2SAM22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,044
Images: 6
Coping With Concealed Carry

This was an interesting article. I think he makes some great points and cautions police and citizens to use their heads in reference to CCW.


http://www.officer.com/publication/printer.jsp?id=44942


Quote:
Citizen Concealed Carry Concerns

Coping With Concealed Carry

Posted: January 11th, 2009 10:23 PM GMT-05:00
STEVE DENNEY
Firearms Contributor


In my column last month, I talked about some of the trends in the firearms industry and how they affected both individuals and their agencies. Interest in concealed carry is another area that has seen a significant increase in activity by ordinary citizens, presumably because of both the current economic situation and the political climate. People are concerned about a perceived increase in crimes of opportunity, as well as more aggressive behavior by criminals. Applications for concealed carry licenses in Florida, for example, have sky-rocketed and firearms safety training classes generally fill up rapidly. Many people tell me that they are getting their carry permits while they can, in anticipation of the need to carry more as times get tougher.
Overall interest in concealed carry has been increasing throughout the country as more and more states adopt some form of shall issue concealed carry laws. At last count, 38 states now have laws that allow concealed carry by anyone who is not disqualified by some particular problem in their background. These are usually referred to as shall issue states. 10 states still have discretionary issue laws, but in some of these states there are few, if any, permits actually granted. There are two states, Illinois and Wisconsin, that do not have any provisions for lawful concealed carry.
In addition, the passage of the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, originally known as H.R. 218 when it was passed by the U.S. Congress in 2004, has opened up more concealed carry to qualified active and retired police officers. As more and more agencies are complying with the provisions of that law, their personnel are becoming more inclined to carry concealed weapons for their own protection and the protection of others. There are also more and more states that are entering into reciprocity agreements to recognize permits issued to residents of other states, as well as some states that have provisions for issuing permits to non-residents. My home state of Florida, for example, not only issues permits to non-residents, but has reciprocity with 33 other states as well. On top of all of the concealed carry states, there are also a number of states that permit open carry, under at least some circumstances. All of this means, of course, that the potential for law enforcement officers to encounter lawfully armed citizens is increasing nationwide.
Such potential, however, also increases the possibility of dangerous interactions between the police and the public. When you consider the number of mistaken identity problems that already occur with off duty or plainclothes officers, you can see that some prior thought and planning is necessary to react appropriately and professionally to the situation. Most officers that I've talked with about civilian concealed carry support the concept, but do have legitimate concerns about what could happen when their duties bring them into contact with such lawfully armed citizens.
I deliberately use the term lawfully armed citizen because it is necessary to differentiate between those folks and people who are armed for criminal purposes. Some officers seem to feel that anyone who is armed is either a criminal or a potential criminal, and react accordingly. In some cases this leads to over-reaction and some very unpleasant consequences. It does make your job more difficult when you have to decide how to react to someone who is lawfully armed, but this is just one more area that requires decisions made based on the totality of the circumstances at hand. When I did a seminar, Coping With Concealed Carry, about this several years ago at the last ASLET (American Society for Law Enforcement Trainers) annual conference, most people understood that you can't do a felony take-down of anyone you meet that happens to be armed. As with other aspects of police work, the circumstances dictate the response, and people who are not acting in any illegal or threatening manner cannot be subjected to arbitrary actions simply in response to exercising their legal rights.
Some states have attempted to assist with this by passing laws that establish what is required when such meetings occur. Some states, for example, require that people carrying concealed weapons must notify an officer they are carrying when any contact is initiated, for any reason. Some states do not. Some states have their drivers license and vehicle registration systems linked to their carry permit data bases. Some do not. Some agencies have developed policies for such encounters, but some seem to leave it up to the individual officers. My recommendation is that each agency needs to have a consistent policy, based on applicable laws in each jurisdiction, that is understood and followed by their officers. It also needs to be a policy that can be articulated to the public, so they know what to expect and what is expected of them.
I tried to come up with some broad guidelines for both sides of the equation and found that there were three things for each side that are nearly identical, depending on your perspective. From a police standpoint, I think these three things are reasonable to expect from any armed citizen:
First, the armed citizen should know and follow the laws that are applicable in their state or particular circumstance. Choosing to be armed in society is a serious responsibility and before you do so I think you have an obligation to know what the laws are and to follow them. This is an area where agencies can help everyone by having information or training available for the public, so that people can get the information they need as easily as possible. Yes, there are going to be some yahoos out there that don't want to make the effort to thoroughly understand their responsibilities, but the information needs to be available, as least.
Second, I think that lawfully armed citizens must comply with the instructions of any officers that they encounter. Simply put, do what the nice police officer tells you to do.
Third, don't do anything stupid. This is probably the tough one and is admittedly sort of a catch-all that depends on the circumstances at the time. Unfortunately, many of the mistaken identity shooting of police officers by police officers are the result of not understanding that armed people have a serious obligation to have their brain cells front-and-center at all times.
From the citizen's perspective, I think there are three things that are reasonable for the armed citizen to expect from the police.
First, the police should know and follow the law. Sounds familiar, yes? You'd be surprised how many officers don't know what the laws are that apply to carrying firearms in their jurisdictions. I've heard some things said by officers that are simply made up on the spot. Law enforcement officers must know and follow the laws, just like the citizens. Agencies are responsible for ensuring proper training and officers are responsible for properly applying the law. I can assure you that many people who are carrying have researched the law and some know it better than the officers. It's good that the citizens make that effort, and it is essential that the police do their homework as well. If this doesn't happen, I expect to see an increase in lawsuits when officers violate the law themselves, whether unintentionally or otherwise. One thing I always try to get across to officers whom I talk with is that citizens are doing their research and it can be embarrassing, at the very least, when the citizen knows more about the law than they do.
Second, then, the instructions that officers give the lawfully armed citizen must be legitimate and based on the law. If the citizen is going to do what the nice police officer tells him to so, the nice police officer has the obligation to give the correct instructions.
Finally, the same caution applies to the officer: don't do anything stupid. If everyone is using their heads, there should not be any problems, regardless of the circumstances. This includes if an armed citizen has actually had to use the gun for self defense. My seminar went into a lot of detail about this, but there isn't room for that here. Suffice it to say that if shots have been fired, things really escalate and the potential for mistakes rises exponentially. Tactics for police response to these types of incidents are very involved, as are the appropriate actions by someone who has had to use deadly force in self defense.
Again, a proactive approach by all concerned can help prevent dangerous situations from turning into tragedies. The closest corollaries that we have are the mistaken shootings of off duty or plainclothes officers, by responding officers, in the aftermath of deadly force encounters. The same sort of tragedies can occur with armed citizens.
Obviously, this is just a broad overview of the kinds of things that I try to teach to both police officers and ordinary citizens who feel the need to be armed in public. The devil, as they say, is in the details. My purpose here is to try to get everyone thinking before the need for action arrives. As more and more people make the choice to carry firearms for self defense, there will be more potential for police interaction with lawfully armed members of the public. Being prepared and treating the situation, and each other, with the necessary respect will go a long way to minimizing the inherent dangers. Please, be careful and be safe.
__________________
"You screw up in Texas, they burn their trash." - Clint Smith

http://profile.ak.facebook.com/object3/489/42/n73725616317_6078.jpgConcerns of Police Survivors, Inc. (COPS)
2SAM22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2009, 07:37 AM #2
joppaj's Avatar
joppaj joppaj is offline


Sheepdog
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Silver Spring
Posts: 33,145
joppaj joppaj is offline


Sheepdog
joppaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Silver Spring
Posts: 33,145
Good read...
__________________
Winterseed Rifleman

If you must make a compromise to carry a concealed handgun, compromise on fashion, not the firearm.
joppaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2009, 08:18 AM #3
Spot77's Avatar
Spot77 Spot77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 12,044
Spot77 Spot77 is offline
Senior Member
Spot77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 12,044
I like it, and if that were a contract to be signed in order for MD to issue me a permit I think I'd find it quite fair. The article also fairly sums up what 97% of legally armed citizens and 97% of police officers feel about police/ccw encounters.

Thanks Vince.
Spot77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2009, 08:36 AM #4
kohburn's Avatar
kohburn kohburn is offline
Resident MacGyver
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PAX NAS / CP MCAS
Posts: 6,663
kohburn kohburn is offline
Resident MacGyver
kohburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PAX NAS / CP MCAS
Posts: 6,663
definatly good - sticky worthy, imo, so that nobody misses out on an oportunity to read it.
__________________
Quote:
The measure of a manís life is the well spending of it, and not the length.
***Plutarch
kohburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2009, 07:57 PM #5
alucard0822's Avatar
alucard0822 alucard0822 is online now
For great Justice
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 14,116
Images: 11
alucard0822 alucard0822 is online now
For great Justice
alucard0822's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 14,116
Images: 11
Very good read, and informative to have a little bit of insight to how police are trained to respond to people like me, who CC anytime, anywhere it is legal to do so. So far I have only been approached while carrying once, I was open carrying on my property doing some yard work only a couple weeks after moving to PA, Officer Mike used to hang out in the gun shop that is now my basement, and just wanted to stop by to say welcome. He barely made any mention of the 686 on my hip, other than to invite me to shoot at the neighborhood gun club/range. In fact all dealings I have had with the police here have been extremely positive, Windsor is a small town where most everyone knows each other, the police are very courteous, and are well respected by the citizens, it is a complete 180 from the fear of police, and disrespect bestowed upon them that seemed so prevalent in Baltimore city. Concealed and Open carry in the area are also VERY common, firearms are viewed completely different than what I am used to in MD, there is no mystique, no prevalent culture of fear, guns are simply a way of life that everyone either embraces, or at least silently tolerates. I also make it a point to know the law, follow it to the letter, and keep a copy of the PA uniform firearms act with me incase of a "misunderstanding". There have been a couple of incidents in places around PA, and the resulting lawsuits have led to more training of police to avoid unnecesary confrontations with armed citizens, the PAFOA has been very succesful in this reguard, to both educate police and citizens to their rights and responsibilities, to take action aggainst those who commit injustice, and to protect citizens and officers who are within their constitutional rights.
__________________
"Unfortunately, freedom allows sh*theads to get away with stuff. You always know the mark of a coward. A coward hides behind freedom. A brave person stands in front of freedom and defends it for others."
-Henry Rollins
alucard0822 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2009, 03:11 PM #6
Charybdis69's Avatar
Charybdis69 Charybdis69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Takoma Park, MD
Posts: 241
Send a message via AIM to Charybdis69 Send a message via Yahoo to Charybdis69
Charybdis69 Charybdis69 is offline
Member
Charybdis69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Takoma Park, MD
Posts: 241
Send a message via AIM to Charybdis69 Send a message via Yahoo to Charybdis69
Very good read. Thanks for posting. It makes me wonder what the future holds for "legally armed citizens" when police officers make little distinction between us and criminals.
__________________
Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, "If I live I will kill you, if I die you are forgiven". Such is the rule of honor.
Charybdis69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2009, 03:59 PM #7
2SAM22's Avatar
2SAM22 2SAM22 is offline


Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,044
Images: 6
2SAM22 2SAM22 is offline


Moderator
2SAM22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,044
Images: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charybdis69 View Post
Very good read. Thanks for posting. It makes me wonder what the future holds for "legally armed citizens" when police officers make little distinction between us and criminals.
I think you may have misread it then. When a police officer comes upon someone who is armed. Their first instinct is to protect their ass because that person could kill them quickly. So, initially, yes, little distinction is made regarding the officers safety. The difference is the criminal will do and make stupid decisions while the law abiding, legally armed citizen will probably use and abundance of caution in following the officers requests.

Split second reactions have to be made. This article is warning both police and armed citizens to be careful and make appropriate decisions.
Personally, I'd prefer the responsible, law abiding citizens of this state be armed. They are the GOOD GUYS!
__________________
"You screw up in Texas, they burn their trash." - Clint Smith

http://profile.ak.facebook.com/object3/489/42/n73725616317_6078.jpgConcerns of Police Survivors, Inc. (COPS)
2SAM22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2009, 06:39 PM #8
Rattlesnake46319's Avatar
Rattlesnake46319 Rattlesnake46319 is offline
Curmidget
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jefferson County, MO
Posts: 10,878
Images: 2
Rattlesnake46319 Rattlesnake46319 is offline
Curmidget
Rattlesnake46319's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jefferson County, MO
Posts: 10,878
Images: 2
Good read, Vince. I like the fact that he mentions that some officers have made up laws on the spot that were completely wrong. Easiest way to deal with it, know the laws yourself, be polite and professional, and if you feel you've been wronged, get the officer's name and take a trip down to the station. It DOES get taken care of.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
well, this degenerated from unnecessary to downright bizarre in a hurry.
Rattlesnake46319 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2010, 08:57 PM #9
Right2Carry's Avatar
Right2Carry Right2Carry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: District 21
Posts: 651
Right2Carry Right2Carry is offline
Member
Right2Carry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: District 21
Posts: 651
Nice article!
Right2Carry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2010, 09:18 PM #10
Drmsparks's Avatar
Drmsparks Drmsparks is offline
Old School Rifleman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PG county
Posts: 8,258
Images: 35
Drmsparks Drmsparks is offline
Old School Rifleman
Drmsparks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PG county
Posts: 8,258
Images: 35
Thanks Vince, very good read. I agree that it would make a great sticky.
__________________
"There is something special about the Garand: there is no other rifle quite like it. When you step up to the line with an M1 Garand, people will turn their heads and take notice. Strong men will respect you. Beautiful women will fall at your feet. The enemies of freedom will flee in dismay."
---Threeband

MSI EM --- NRA Endowment Member --- CMP Competitor --- NRA Expert HP Rifle
Drmsparks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service