One error on his part. Despite earlier exploring and nicely defining natural laws, he refers along the way to the 2A "creating a right" when he should have said "protecting a right" - I'll call that one an oversight, because he obviously gets it.
Now, if we could just get a version of this exact same thing that avoids a couple of its gratuitous stick-in-the-eye provocations towards the grabbers, it could be used routinely to educate the ignernt, instead of immediately putting them on the defensive because it tries to be amusing to an audience like ours, which gets the jokes.