Judge blocks California magazine ban

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,918
    WV
    Appeal to 3 court bench, ruling upheld.
    9CA en banc will magically appear and overturn
    SCOTUS will deny cert
    Thomas and Gorsuch will further lament.

    Meanwhile, Czech's will probably be moving to buying full auto from the grocery store.

    This would be my guess as well, although our odds at the 3 judge panel aren't good either.
     

    Mr H

    Banana'd
    Ask a typical Yalie how to change a car tire and he'll produce a copiously and extensively referenced artful dissertation (with Latin translation): Tire-Changing in the 21st Century: The Thinking Man's Guide to Navigating America's Roadways. But whaddya think happens on his way home from receiving the Pulitzer prize when he gets a flat? He's gotta ring the AAA, because he hasn't a clue how to actually, mechanically change a freaking tire.
    Dat's the difference between theory (the two-dimensional utopia that Bolshies inhabit) and practice (where real America can-do spirit lives).

    "In theory, there's no difference between theory and fact. In fact, there is."

    --Yogi Berra
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    Would the words “whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation.” a federal judge have any impact on our own mag restrictions?
    If that federal judge is on SCOTUS ruling in our favor, sure. Otherwise... no.
     

    highli99

    Ultimate Member
    Nov 10, 2015
    2,551
    West Side
    That federal judge has a brilliant judicial career ahead.

    On administrative duty. Reviewing contracts for janitorial services for the courthouse, etc.

    But, it is a lifetime sentence, er, uh, appointment.

    I've made a excellent career reviewing janitorial contracts. It's a good life.
     

    Defense Rifle

    Active Member
    Jul 1, 2016
    238
    NC
    This judge was appointed by Pres. George W. Bush. The ban on possession of "high capacity magazines" was suppose to go into effect tomorrow in California.
     

    fred333

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 20, 2013
    12,340
    Bill and Hillary are Yalies. You think they know that much, or care? You think they call AAA themselves? Hillary would have a temper tantrum aimed at whoever let the tire get flat. Bill would have an intern do it, giving her instructions "First, bend over and lean against the tire..."

    You can't argue with historical fact. I stand corrected. ;)
     

    fred333

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 20, 2013
    12,340
    "In theory, there's no difference between theory and fact. In fact, there is."
    --Yogi Berra

    A couple of Yogi Berra's teammates swear that one night the stocky catcher was horrified to see a baby toppling off the roof of a cottage across the way from him. Yogi dashed over and made a miraculous catch - but then force of habit proved too much for him. He straightened up and threw the baby to second base.
     

    danb

    dont be a dumbass
    Feb 24, 2013
    22,704
    google is your friend, I am not.
    Injunction upheld, ban stays in place for now.

    http://reason.com/volokh/2018/07/17/second-amendment-injunction-against-cali

    In Duncan v. Becerra, a federal district court had issued a preliminary injunction blocking the enforcement of California's ban on magazines that fit more than 10 rounds, pending a full trial on the merits. Today, the Ninth Circuit upheld this, in a 2-1 nonprecedential decision, though one that heavily deferred to the lower court's judgment, and didn't prejudge the final result after a trial is held and the final judgment is issued and appealed.

    Kopel has a separet post too, here: http://reason.com/volokh/2018/07/17/ninth-circuit-upholds-preliminary-injunc
     

    Mike OTDP

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 12, 2008
    3,324
    Very good! It means that instead of being able to grab magazines today and go to court several years from now, California must go to court first. And it sets a precedent for continuing to stay enforcement until all appeals have been exhausted.
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,176
    Anne Arundel County
    Even better, because the District Court still hasn't rendered its final decision, Kavanaugh will be seated on SCOTUS well before (as in years) the inevitable 9CA appellate or en banc decision against 2A gets appealed to SCOTUS.
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,288
    Even better, because the District Court still hasn't rendered its final decision, Kavanaugh will be seated on SCOTUS well before (as in years) the inevitable 9CA appellate or en banc decision against 2A gets appealed to SCOTUS.

    Long enough that Trump may get even another appointment or two in before the case gets heard.:party29:
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Great news indeed.

    Really great news. And it supports MSI's and the other plaintiffs' Takings suit on the bump stocks. That last line that an uncompensated Taking cannot be justified by police powers is key.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,552
    Messages
    7,286,155
    Members
    33,476
    Latest member
    Spb5205

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom