MSP Appeals to the Office of Administrative Hearings
- Thread starter EdHershon
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I know of at least 10 hearings before the OAH so far, possibly more. Saw in either the Daily Record or Maryland Matters the other day that the MSP have appealed at least 22 cases.
As Welder said, we won't know anything for probably a short while yet.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,726
The first cases were recently being heard. Quite a coincidence this tweet on February 10th.
Wow...The first cases were recently being heard. Quite a coincidence this tweet on February 10th.
He's not mincing words I guess. Too bad he's ill informed, or more simply.... outright lying.
Straightshooter
Ultimate Member
Any chance you'd give some insight as to how these hearings are conducted compared to the HPRB hearings? More formal? Allowing you adequate chance to provide your side? Or does it appear to be a chopping block session?
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
The first cases were recently being heard. Quite a coincidence this tweet on February 10th.
Frosh needs to put up or shut up on that serious accusation. If HPRB is violating the law, how are they doing it? By exercising their lawful authority to overrule decisions made by MSPLD? That doesn't fit under any definition of "breaking the law" that I'm aware of.
I would be happy to answer questions , hard to do here but I will try .
The rooms are as big as a closet , no room for a posse . Friendly less people . The same MSP troopers that are at HPRB are at the hearings .
Like a less formal court hearing my hearing lasted 1 hr. 45 mins. approx. lots of information and legal jargon . Business permits must have an attorney . That is the Cliff note version .
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,726
So with the Frosh tweet, is the script written on HB1343 ?
That is ponderous. No idea what could go on that long.
That is ponderous. No idea what could go on that long.
Straightshooter
Ultimate Member
I would have been lost there without my very capable attorney , take it from me this is for someone that has law knowledge . And that is not me .
I try to stay in my lane .
On one of the two sheets they sent it was stated on the paper businesses must have representation/lawyer
How can you force somebody to have an attorney? Is the state making up more law?
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,726
If you are sole proprietor, Single member LLC or 100% shareholder in a closed corporation, I can't see how how they can stop you from going pro se. It's ridiculous in any circumstance as shareholders or partners are at risk how?
Well it's on the paperwork
I don't remember the exact wordage but it says something as close to that as possible . I was surprised as well .That's right it said something about Corporation . We are INC. Not Sole or LLC
Second Business is LLC which has not made it on permit
Well it's on the paperwork
Can you post it? Might be another constitutional infringement.
And to be clear nobody forces you to do anything , you decide and their ******** cost you money much like other Government BS cost you money . When our state needs more money for free programs they then think of new stuff so we can pay for the free stuff .
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
MD DNR Outdoor Recreation Survey -- Outdoorsman Responses Needed (2 Viewers)
- Started by Derwood
- Replies: 5
-
-