What Supressor recomended for a full auto .223

Boss94 · Jan 14, 2016

Looking for a unit to hold up to a ton of full auto firing. What say you ? Whats on the market to take it and hold up?

AMStrick · Jan 15, 2016

AWC Systems manufactures a 5.56 suppressor rated for full auto sustained fire. The unit is also rated to fire in confined spaces without hearing pro. The can is called "Raider", constructed from Stainless Steel. AWC also makes a Raider from Titanium, but this version is not rated for full auto fire.

I have one pending ATF stamp. I've been waiting for 5 months, should be getting the call any day from Fred's to pick up my can.

Sundazes · Jan 15, 2016

Paging Bob and Rside......

rsideout · Jan 15, 2016

I use the AAC M4-2000 and AAC 762SDN-6. I've never had any problems. Others in my club use the Saker and YHM Phantom. All of them do well.

Bourbonstamps · Jan 15, 2016

Specwar

trex · Jan 15, 2016

I have the YHM Phantom and love it

vgplayer · Jan 15, 2016

Don't have one but Rugged Suppressors claims theirs are belt-fed rated.

Billman · Jan 15, 2016

I beat the crap out of a AAC 762sdn6 and a buddy of mine has fired just about everything through his YHM Pantom 7.62.

Boss94 · Jan 15, 2016

Ok that brings up another question. Should I get a .308 unit for my scar and also use it for my .223 guns ?knowing me I'd end up with at least one of each lol.

ar15dave · Jan 15, 2016

I have a AAC 762SDN6 for my M16 and it works great.

SCARCQB · Jan 15, 2016

AAC m4-2000 or their 7.62 cans. They are full auto rated. I've used mine on SBR uppers to beltfed shrikes.
I prefer a 308 can for full auto. It doesn't overgas the system.

IMBLITZVT · Jan 15, 2016

SCARCQB said:
AAC m4-2000 or their 7.62 cans. They are full auto rated. I've used mine on SBR uppers to beltfed shrikes.
I prefer a 308 can for full auto. It doesn't overgas the system.

When testing cans for the Shrike, I found that a 556 can did not have the volume to handle the rate of fire. Kind of like putting a pistol can on a SMG. I am going to get an Omega from Silencerco.

As far as a standard M16, You might get away with a 556 can, as this might just be the issue with belt fed and a higher rate of fire.

SCARCQB · Jan 15, 2016

IMBLITZVT said:
When testing cans for the Shrike, I found that a 556 can did not have the volume to handle the rate of fire. Kind of like putting a pistol can on a SMG. I am going to get an Omega from Silencerco.

As far as a standard M16, You might get away with a 556 can, as this might just be the issue with belt fed and a higher rate of fire.

What do you mean by can't handle the volume of fire? You doing a 200 round dump?

vgplayer · Jan 15, 2016

Must be one of the 30 caliber clips that fire in half second ghost guns :sarcasm:

IMBLITZVT · Jan 15, 2016

SCARCQB said:
What do you mean by can't handle the volume of fire? You doing a 200 round dump?

Yes

I just mean the higher cycle rate and more than burst fire.

Soon I will have a tripod adapter made and then we will get to the real volume of fire! I also now have a 20, 16 and two 12.5" barrels. So I can switch them out as they heat up. Do I need a suppressor for each?

SCARCQB · Jan 15, 2016

Why would you want to suppress the report of sustained full automatic fire?

The sound alone is better than racking a shotgun .lol.

If you need a mount. Look at sage international. The make an attenuating mount and adapter that will work with the rails on a shrike, mcr or ebr. You can use a tripod afterwards.

IMBLITZVT · Jan 15, 2016

SCARCQB said:
Why would you want to suppress the report of sustained full automatic fire?

The sound alone is better than racking a shotgun .lol.

If you need a mount. Look at sage international. The make an attenuating mount and adapter that will work with the rails on a shrike, mcr or ebr. You can use a tripod afterwards.

Why not? I have Maxim with 250rd Belts of 8mm and 7.62x54r if I want to hear something. Now I don't want to hear it!

Sage has those adaptors but they are crazy expensive, like $550. Plus I can't find them actually for sale anywhere. However, yes on the right track. I had plans to make one using a ARMS 7 mount upside down on a custom cradle.

rico903 · Jan 15, 2016

My SDN 6 has worked well for both calibers.

Boss94 · Jan 15, 2016

SCARCQB said:
Why would you want to suppress the report of sustained full automatic fire?

The sound alone is better than racking a shotgun .lol.

If you need a mount. Look at sage international. The make an attenuating mount and adapter that will work with the rails on a shrike, mcr or ebr. You can use a tripod afterwards.

1 of the places I shoot at is a long thin piece of property. Has a good distance ( out to about 700 yards) But there is that 1 house who doesn't mind semi fire or small caliber . But when the belt fed .223s are having fun. She calls The county police, State police and God knows who else. So I figured Id invest in a can or 3 for this purpose. I have them mounted on the MG 42 aircraft mounts via a picatinny adapter. Works great !

Boss94 · Jan 17, 2016

Thanks for the help !! I started paperwork on 2 AAC 762 SD units :-)

What Supressor recomended for a full auto .223

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Throbbing Member

Senior Member

Active Member

Member

Ultimate Member

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

Ultimate Member

AR15Dave

Get Opp my rawn, Plick!

Attachments

Ultimate Member

Get Opp my rawn, Plick!

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Get Opp my rawn, Plick!

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics