House Judicial Proceedings - THE GUN BILLS - LIVE FEED
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
New billl up. Antis first. Talking about victims listing names. Suspense is killing me. Victims of shooters shot by prohibited persons. OMG does this happen?
Danielle is up. Too easy for abusers to get guns that are prohibited. (Too bad she doesn't talk about prior criminal history and revolving door lack of justice). Saying people who are convicted are not turning over weapons. People can go home from court and get their gun and commit crime. Wants notification at trial.
Raineman
On the 3rd box
Only turn in options are Law Enforcement OR Gun Dealer--NO other options.
Screws any family of investment value.
Screws any family of investment value.
Another MDA Johns Hopkins doctor. (PhD or md) Not saying how law would make a difference. Talking about other states that have similar laws. Says laws prohibit violence.
Another MDA. Just giving the sponsor a verbal BJ for introducing legislation. Wants disqualified to be notified. Talking about trial summary sheet. Talking about what to to when notified - but didn't give details.
Legislator asking about details. Can't hear, speakers down.
Now the video is down also
Legislator asking about cost and wanted to address letter that says it would cost 7.2 mil to implement.
just lost the feed
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,759
Shenanigans
damn Russians
As a reminder, HB1424 is before the committee.
Requiring a court to inform a person convicted of a specified disqualifying crime that the person is prohibited from possessing a firearm under specified provisions of law; requiring the court to advise the person that specified proof must be provided to the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services that specified firearms owned by the person or in the person's possession have been transferred from the person's possession; etc.
Requiring a court to inform a person convicted of a specified disqualifying crime that the person is prohibited from possessing a firearm under specified provisions of law; requiring the court to advise the person that specified proof must be provided to the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services that specified firearms owned by the person or in the person's possession have been transferred from the person's possession; etc.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
3rd Circuit Case - Range v Atty General Non-Violent Misdemeanor as a Prohibitor (3 Viewers)- Latest: BurkeM
-
-
-
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
Sign up on our online store and earn 1000 points- Started by J_Gunslinger
- Replies: 2
-
-
