Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 22nd, 2019, 08:27 PM #11
Stoveman's Avatar
Stoveman Stoveman is offline
TV Personality
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cuba on the Chesapeake
Posts: 13,907
Stoveman Stoveman is offline
TV Personality
Stoveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cuba on the Chesapeake
Posts: 13,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boots215 View Post
Request could be a violation of federal law:

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ic-leg...cy-act-of-1959

Section 6 of the National Security Agency Act of 1959 (“Section 6”), Pub. L. No. 86-36, 73 Stat. 63, 64 (codified at 50 U.S.C. § 402 note) states:

Sec. 6. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, nothing in this Act or any other law (including, but not limited to, the first section and section 2 of the Act of August 28, 1935 (5 U.S.C. 654) (repealed by Pub. L. 86-626, title I, Sec. 101, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 427)) shall be construed to require the disclosure of the organization or any function of the National Security Agency, or any information with respect to the activities thereof, or of the names, titles, salaries, or number of the persons employed by such agency.(b) The reporting requirements of section 1582 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to positions established in the National Security Agency in the manner provided by section 4 of this Act.


See the post below yours.
__________________
_______________
Proud CCW Cultist
Stoveman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2019, 09:56 PM #12
Chiefscs Chiefscs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Md
Posts: 4
Chiefscs Chiefscs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Md
Posts: 4
My security mgr could not print anything out of JPAS, but he did print a letter confirming what the clearance type with his CAC signature.
Chiefscs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2019, 10:11 PM #13
pen pen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Carroll county
Posts: 16
pen pen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Carroll county
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefscs View Post
My security mgr could not print anything out of JPAS, but he did print a letter confirming what the clearance type with his CAC signature.
That's all the OP needs. A verification. I never understood why FSO's and SSO's are reluctant to acknowledge clearances. "yes John Smith is cleared at the TS level", adjudicated favorably on so and so date.
pen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2019, 11:12 PM #14
Not_an_outlaw Not_an_outlaw is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Prince Frederick, MD
Posts: 3,648
Not_an_outlaw Not_an_outlaw is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Prince Frederick, MD
Posts: 3,648
I'm in PAX River. I emailed three security managers and my boss. Boss had no idea, none of the security managers responded. Asked MSP for the PAX security POC for which they call, and they wouldn't give it to me. Even the MSP is secret squirrel on secrets. Seems like a definitive position could be made official.
Not_an_outlaw is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 22nd, 2019, 11:36 PM #15
CyclicUpvote CyclicUpvote is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 32
CyclicUpvote CyclicUpvote is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefscs View Post
My security mgr could not print anything out of JPAS, but he did print a letter confirming what the clearance type with his CAC signature.
Yup. A letter with org letterhead will do fine.

The trooper who did my interview provided me with both an official letter on MSP letterhead to give my FSO explaining the request and what info they needed, and also an example letter to show what a good letter would look like.

Basically the letter will need to say something like

[person] has a _____ clearance, granted by [clearance adjudication authority], investigation finalized as of [date]. This clearance is current. [person] uses this clearance in their job duties. There are no known investigations or other circumstances at this time which would be likely to change/revoke [person's] cleared status.
CyclicUpvote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23rd, 2019, 06:04 PM #16
CyclicUpvote CyclicUpvote is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 32
CyclicUpvote CyclicUpvote is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 32
In fact, does anyone need to see an example? I'm assuming MSP will give you a copy, but I could post a screen shot of a sample letter if anyone needs it.
CyclicUpvote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2019, 11:05 AM #17
dreadpirate's Avatar
dreadpirate dreadpirate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cuba on the Chesapeake
Posts: 5,469
dreadpirate dreadpirate is offline
Senior Member
dreadpirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cuba on the Chesapeake
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
My permit expires at the end of this month. I sent my renewal in back in December, they cashed the check on 12/24. They sent me an email on 2/15 that ended up in my spam folder stating that they needed:

1. Please submit a letter (on agency letterhead) from your security manager verifying your current level of Federal security clearance with the name and contact number of the Security Manager drafting the document.

Has anyone had any luck getting their security folks to write something like that? When I asked a couple years ago for the initial permit I was told it was a violation for them to provide that information to uncleared folks even if they are the police.

It seems to me that they may be asking for something they know I can't provide so they don't have to renew my permit.

If anyone has a work around or experience with this I would appreciate some help.
Yes - I have had luck in getting a letter from my Security manager. I'll tell you, when it comes to getting a contract, companies have NO PROBLEM advertising who has a clearance. None of this is classified. If someone is refusing to do this, it's because (in my opinion) they don't want to be involved with allowing someone to get a handgun permit.
__________________
US Army Veteran 82 - 92
NRA Life Member
Maryland Shall Issue Executive Member
SOTAR Alumnus
dreadpirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2019, 11:16 AM #18
dreadpirate's Avatar
dreadpirate dreadpirate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cuba on the Chesapeake
Posts: 5,469
dreadpirate dreadpirate is offline
Senior Member
dreadpirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cuba on the Chesapeake
Posts: 5,469
And here's another thing I will say; if you have managers that are basically saying "I am not doing ANYTHING for you that I don't have to" then fine - it's a 2 way street. I would consider options where the management has a different attitude. I have worked in and with various organizations, the attitude and extent to which management is willing to be helpful to their their bodies in the body shop varies greatly.
__________________
US Army Veteran 82 - 92
NRA Life Member
Maryland Shall Issue Executive Member
SOTAR Alumnus
dreadpirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2019, 01:29 PM #19
Blaster229's Avatar
Blaster229 Blaster229 is offline
God loves you, I don't.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Glen Burnie
Posts: 29,443
Blaster229 Blaster229 is offline
God loves you, I don't.
Blaster229's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Glen Burnie
Posts: 29,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boots215 View Post
Request could be a violation of federal law:

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ic-leg...cy-act-of-1959

Section 6 of the National Security Agency Act of 1959 (“Section 6”), Pub. L. No. 86-36, 73 Stat. 63, 64 (codified at 50 U.S.C. § 402 note) states:

Sec. 6. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, nothing in this Act or any other law (including, but not limited to, the first section and section 2 of the Act of August 28, 1935 (5 U.S.C. 654) (repealed by Pub. L. 86-626, title I, Sec. 101, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 427)) shall be construed to require the disclosure of the organization or any function of the National Security Agency, or any information with respect to the activities thereof, or of the names, titles, salaries, or number of the persons employed by such agency.(b) The reporting requirements of section 1582 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to positions established in the National Security Agency in the manner provided by section 4 of this Act.
That's for NSA.
__________________
Do the do's. Don't do the don'ts.
Blaster229 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service