BUMP STOCK SUIT FILED!

[Rab1515]

Originally Posted by Qbeam

I can vouch that he's not Frosh. He's entitled to his opinion, although I disagree with him. It's the principle of the matter regarding this piece of plasic. If they go after accessories, what's to stop them from going after other accessories? The optic angle has not been addressed, but with the new scopes, where you "tag" the target and it does the rest, that makes anyone a sniper in their eyes. This is just an excuse for infringement. I'm not a big shotgun fan, but I don't want them to be infringed just because I don't see a use for a shotgun accessory. Just because you don't see a need for an item, doesn't make it less of an infringement. That's where the anti-gun folks excel. They know the "Fudds" will support any legislation that doesn't affect their shotguns and hunting rifles. Divide and conquer. The last few mass shootings were with shotguns, seems interesting that no one is moving full tilt yet on banning shotguns....



To some it may appear as a piece of plastic, but to others, it is an infringement. They just keep taking more of the cake away from us.



Q

Just one more bite.

[Rab1515]

Originally Posted by Abulg1972

Sir. A plastic accessory is not a firearm. The fact that you inbreds don’t understand this is disconcerting.

Exactly so why bother banning it?

[GolfR]

Originally Posted by Abulg1972

Sir. A plastic accessory is not a firearm. The fact that you inbreds don’t understand this is disconcerting.

My personal view is that you are right, it is not a firearm. (The inbreads statement is inappropriate) What is not recognized here is that this piece of plastic is something that many here have legally purchased with hard earned money and the government has now determined to be illegal and is demanding that we turn in for no compensation. Additially, when and where does this stop? Can they make bolts illegal and confiscate them all? How about firing pins? What about guns with sights, are those illegal? A sliding stock or binary trigger DOESNT make a gun more dangerous in the hands of a law abiding owner.

If a bad person wants to do a bad thing, they will find a way. Removing firearms or accessories from the hands of good people is not going to do a damn thing to prevent crime.

[Stoveman]

Originally Posted by GolfR

My personal view is that you are right, it is not a firearm. (The inbreads statement is inappropriate) What is not recognized here is that this piece of plastic is something that many here have legally purchased with hard earned money and the government has now determined to be illegal and is demanding that we turn in for no compensation. Additially, when and where does this stop? Can they make bolts illegal and confiscate them all? How about firing pins? What about guns with sights, are those illegal? A sliding stock or binary trigger DOESNT make a gun more dangerous in the hands of a law abiding owner.

If a bad person wants to do a bad thing, they will find a way. Removing firearms or accessories from the hands of good people is not going to do a damn thing to prevent crime.

Stop with the facts, our friend has shown that he is perfectly content with the government banning pieces of plastic whether they be bump stocks or tv remotes or toothbrushes and will gladly lick the boot of his oppressors as they do it.

[Rab1515]

Originally Posted by Abulg1972

I like that he calls us “activists”. Or, just regular citizens who want to keep buttholes from taking our property without paying us FMV.

I wish I could read the comments but I’m not on FB.

Hmmm what changed?

[Rack&Roll]

Originally Posted by Abulg1972

Sir. A plastic accessory is not a firearm. The fact that you inbreds don’t understand this is disconcerting.

So, you support a system of government where everything is forbidden unless approved?

You say you are “fully informed”.

You do understand what system of government you are aligned with, correct?

[Abulg1972]

Originally Posted by Stoveman

Stop with the facts, our friend has shown that he is perfectly content with the government banning pieces of plastic whether they be bump stocks or tv remotes or toothbrushes and will gladly lick the boot of his oppressors as they do it.

Sadly, my friend, America is no longer the Wild West. We now have laws. I am a citizen of this country and am subject to its laws, as interpreted by the courts. I have studied the constitution for a long time and simply cannot find a provision that guarantees my right to own a plastic accessory or remote control. If you know of that provision, I would be very happy if you could identify it for me.

The problem in this country - and the reason for my tongue in cheek inbred comment - is that there are people driving on the gravel right median of the road and then there are people driving on the gravel left median of the road, and only a few of us want to drive within the white lines. The effect of that is that very few people want to conversate and negotiate. Everyone else wants to duel to the death. Thus, no progress can be had.

To everyone, I say good night and Godspeed.

[Abulg1972]

Originally Posted by Rack&Roll

So, you support a system of government where everything is forbidden unless approved?



You say you are “fully informed”.



You do understand what system of government you are aligned with, correct?

You must fly the flag upside down. Goodnight.

[Stoveman]

This guy keeps threatening to go to bed but he keeps coming back to show us how enlightened he is.

[GolfR]

Originally Posted by Abulg1972

The problem in this country - and the reason for my tongue in cheek inbred comment - is that there are people driving on the gravel right median of the road and then there are people driving on the gravel left median of the road, and only a few of us want to drive within the white lines. The effect of that is that very few people want to conversate and negotiate. Everyone else wants to duel to the death. Thus, no progress can be had.

This sir I can and do agree with. I will also agree with your statement that we are a country of laws. Regardless of the constitutionality of a piece of plastic, part of the problem is that the left gravel drivers are openly deciding which laws they want to obey (re immigration) and which ones they want to makeup to take away things from those driving on the right side of the road (gun control). It only drives the two drivers farther apart when one side blatantly ignores the law and simultaneously demands that the other side play strictly by the rules.