SigMatt
Ultimate Member
Based on what you provided, novus, I'd say the Saigas are not AKs. Semi-automatic, yes, but internal design and parts layout are totally different.
This is why I hate Maryland's regulated firearms laws. Because having a technical understand of a gun's action and layout doesn't match the layman's. They look at the shell. I could argue that a Saiga shottie and a WASR-10 are not the same weapon despite similarities in their external appearance on some parts.
Likewise, the debate over the Sig 552. The 552 is a different gun. A descendant of the 550/551 family, functionally similar but its internal design is different. Where do we draw the line between "copy of" and new rifle?
This place makes me want to scream in frustration at times. Or go to the range. At least if MD had mirrored the 1994 AWB parameters, we'd have a reasonable, understandable (if pointless) way of determining, as a layman, the difference between regulated and non-regulated.
The law is supposed to be understandable by those it would affect. Everything I've seen from Maryland's laws is the opposite and it seems to be a minefield to trap the unwary by design. I often wonder how FFL's even manage to stay in business in this state at times.
</end_rant>
Matt
This is why I hate Maryland's regulated firearms laws. Because having a technical understand of a gun's action and layout doesn't match the layman's. They look at the shell. I could argue that a Saiga shottie and a WASR-10 are not the same weapon despite similarities in their external appearance on some parts.
Likewise, the debate over the Sig 552. The 552 is a different gun. A descendant of the 550/551 family, functionally similar but its internal design is different. Where do we draw the line between "copy of" and new rifle?
This place makes me want to scream in frustration at times. Or go to the range. At least if MD had mirrored the 1994 AWB parameters, we'd have a reasonable, understandable (if pointless) way of determining, as a layman, the difference between regulated and non-regulated.
The law is supposed to be understandable by those it would affect. Everything I've seen from Maryland's laws is the opposite and it seems to be a minefield to trap the unwary by design. I often wonder how FFL's even manage to stay in business in this state at times.
</end_rant>
Matt