Why it’s shouldn’t matter if we repeal 2A

clingy said:

http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/30/shouldnt-matter-repeal-second-amendment/

One of the best articles I’ve read recently summarizing the natural rights of the Constitution. He’s right, even if they take away the amendment and ban guns through legislation, it’s still our natural right.

I think the real issue here is many anti-gunners don’t believe in natural rights, and it’s becoming more and more apparent.

Click to expand...

danb said:

if you eliminate the 2nd amendment, property rights are next. You can see that elsewhere.

You cannot own property if you cannot defend it.

Socialism, pure and simple.

Click to expand...

jrumann59 said:

No they believe in natural rights, but only the ones they believe in...

Click to expand...

iH8DemLibz said:

Time for a Second Amendment omnibus thread.

Click to expand...

Jim Sr said:

Pretty Amazing!

A blogger added up the deer license sales in just a handful of states and arrived at a striking conclusion: There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state of Wisconsin...
Allow me to restate that number: 600,000!
Over the last several months, Wisconsin 's hunters became the 8th largest army in the world.
(That's more men under arms than in Iran. More than
France and Germany combined.)
These men, deployed to the woods of a single American state, Wisconsin, to hunt with firearms, And NO ONE WAS KILLED.

That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted the woods of Pennsylvania's and Michigan's 700,000 hunters,
ALL OF WHOM HAVE RETURNED HOME SAFELY.
Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia, and it literally establishes the fact that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world. And then add in the total number of hunters in the other 46 states. It's millions more

________ The point? ________
America will forever be safe from foreign invasion with that kind of home-grown firepower!
Hunting... it's not just a way to fill the freezer. It's also a matter of national security.
That's why all enemies, foreign and domestic, want to see us disarmed. Food for thought, when next we consider gun control. Overall it's true, so if we disregard some assumptions that hunters don't possess the same skills as soldiers, the question would still remain...
What army of 2 million would want to face 30 million, 40 million, or 50 million armed citizens???
For the sake of our freedom, don't ever allow gun control or confiscation of guns.

Click to expand...