The reason why a Right should not be voted on

Inigoes · Oct 12, 2014

Washington state has two competing ballot initiaves dealing with gun rights.

http://news.yahoo.com/rival-gun-measures-ballot-washington-state-073615058--politics.html

DC-W · Oct 12, 2014

Bloomberg and gates have thrown millions into that bs...

BeoBill · Oct 12, 2014

DC-W said:
Bloomberg and gates have thrown millions into that bs...

They want to buy them some people control. :mad54:

Vile Shadow · Oct 14, 2014

If it saves one life.... :rolleyes:

XRider · Oct 16, 2014

32% would be inclined to vote for both... Don't know what's most appropriate :mad54:

or

Brooklyn · Oct 17, 2014

XRider said:
32% would be inclined to vote for both... Don't know what's most appropriate or

The back story smells like victory. ..... if there were a back story that is.

Boom Boom · Oct 17, 2014

Is there a right to life? Can I vote on restricting theirs? No joke. If they can vote to restrict an enumerated, inalienable human right, then it's only logical that I should be able to vote to restrict their right to continue living. Let's go all in and head right down the slippery slope.

BeoBill · Oct 18, 2014

Boom Boom said:
Is there a right to life? Can I vote on restricting theirs? No joke. If they can vote to restrict an enumerated, inalienable human right, then it's only logical that I should be able to vote to restrict their right to continue living. Let's go all in and head right down the slippery slope.

Oh, you mean like in the Netherlands.

The reason why a Right should not be voted on

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Inigoes

Head'n for the hills

DC-W

Ultimate Member

BeoBill

Crank in the Third Row

Vile Shadow

...

XRider

Active Member

Brooklyn

I stand with John Locke.

Boom Boom

Hold my beer. Watch this.

BeoBill

Crank in the Third Row

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Share this page