En banc Decision in Peruta -- a loss

ddestruel · May 10, 2017

https://www.cwsl.edu/~/media/files/... court_san diego daily transcript_043014.ashx

Just a little 2014 flashback opinion piece to keep up the speculation. Lol

press1280 · May 10, 2017

krucam said:
Chatter on SCOTUSBlog's Relist Watch over Peruta....

http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/05/relist-watch-103/#more-255661

Which, if true, means someone else has asked for the rescheduling.
I'm curious if Esq or anyone else would know if a Justice would hold up a case just to get another signator on a dissent. It would seem more likely that justice is looking at granting cert.

Kharn · May 10, 2017

The docket is not saying there has been another relist, the case is still on for tomorrow's conference.

krucam · May 10, 2017

Kharn said:
The docket is not saying there has been another relist, the case is still on for tomorrow's conference.

I thought that strange as well, no relist from last conference, just another conference date. :tinfoil:

jcutonilli · May 10, 2017

Kharn said:
The docket is not saying there has been another relist, the case is still on for tomorrow's conference.

krucam said:
I thought that strange as well, no relist from last conference, just another conference date.

That is how they relist cases, they list (schedule, distribute) them for one conference, then they relist them for another. It has been listed for more than one conference ie relisted.

Kharn · May 10, 2017

Er, correcting my earlier post, Peruta hasn't been rescheduled as of today. Relisting only happens on Mondays when it fails to be addressed on the orders list and will thus be addressed again at the next conference. Rescheduling occurs the day before the conference when a Justice pulls it from the agenda and places it on the next conference's agenda.

esqappellate · May 10, 2017

press1280 said:
Which, if true, means someone else has asked for the rescheduling.
I'm curious if Esq or anyone else would know if a Justice would hold up a case just to get another signator on a dissent. It would seem more likely that justice is looking at granting cert.

All unknowable. A case be re listed until dissent is released as nothing is final until then. Dissents can change minds on a court

doublins · May 11, 2017

Fingers crossed for today's conference...

Dogabutila · May 12, 2017

Relisted right?

pcfixer · May 12, 2017

Dogabutila said:
Relisted right?

NOT, as of 6:55 AM.
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/peruta-v-california/

krucam · May 12, 2017

Dogabutila said:
Relisted right?

Don't know yet. Nothing on SCOTUSBlog of Orders being out today from Thursdays Conference, perhaps Monday we'll know...

silentdynasty · May 12, 2017

Was hoping to hear some news on this today but like others said Monday may do. Hoping nothing but the best on this.

Gryphon · May 12, 2017

Still no update.

jcutonilli · May 12, 2017

Gryphon said:
Still no update.

That is because the conferences are on Thursday in May and June (no argument days) and the orders list comes out on Monday. I remember this happened for Jackson, which was relisted in April and May of 2015

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/14-704.htm

krucam · May 12, 2017

Are we there yet? No! Are we there yet? No!....

press1280 · May 12, 2017

jcutonilli said:
That is because the conferences are on Thursday in May and June (no argument days) and the orders list comes out on Monday. I remember this happened for Jackson, which was relisted in April and May of 2015

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/14-704.htm

On the calendar there are "non argument days", these are typically when orders lists come out.

doublins · May 15, 2017

Orders should come out at 9:30 EDT today... keep hope alive, boys

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

swinokur · May 15, 2017

krucam · May 15, 2017

Nothing again (grant or denied) in today's orders...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051517zor_986b.pdf

A small blurb from the bloggers:

The court also does not appear to act on Peruta v. California, the case on whether there is a Second Amendment right to carry a handgun for self defense outside the house.

followed by:

But Peruta has "only" been relisted once going into last week's conference.

more on the blog:

22 minutes ago
so, how many times has Peruta been in conference now with no decision on Cert?!
ShareDiscussions1Likes0
andrew

Amy Howe
This is a little bit of a weird one; it had been rescheduled (that is, put off before the conference even happened) a whopping four times, but it had only been relisted once -- and presumably will now have its second relist, although we won't know for sure until the electronic docket is updated later today.
May 15 2017 8:48 AM

Make a comment...
26 minutes ago
If the court does not act on a case that was scheduled for the conference, is it safe to assume that case made it on the "discuss list"?
ShareDiscussions1Likes0
Col. Mustard

Amy Howe
A good question -- I think probably.

Click to expand...

And...guess who signed into SCOTUSBlog for a comment?....

32 minutes ago
Thanks for the blog in the information. ,I have to check back on another day .
ShareDiscussions1Likes0
Edward Peruta

Amy Howe
Wish we had news for you -- maybe next week!
May 15 2017 9:11 AM

danb · May 15, 2017

krucam said:
Nothing again (grant or denied) in today's orders...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051517zor_986b.pdf

A small blurb from the bloggers:

followed by:

People should read Justice Roberts' admonition at the end of the orders (for the 4th circuit voting rights case).

A denial of cert does not mean anything as far as the merits. Might just mean its a procedural nightmare to reach the question.

In other words, past denials is not an indicator of future results.

En banc Decision in Peruta -- a loss

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

President, MSI

Active Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Member

inveniam viam aut faciam

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Active Member

In a State of Bliss

Ultimate Member

dont be a dumbass

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics