Barbara Underwood - Solicitor General for NY. She was absolutely abysmal in her presentation to the SCOTUS. There was not one single argument she had that made any kind of sense.
NYC CCW case is at SCOTUS!
- Thread starter press1280
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
BartExp
Ultimate Member
Who is testifying now?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Solicitor General I believe (Representative for the Biden administration)
Barbara Underwood is the Solicitor General - I'm not sure who this guy is.
The interesting thing is that they keep citing these old archaic laws from the mid/late 1800s, but those laws were very likely unconstitutional as well.
She is for NY, he is Fed (Representative for the Biden administration)
At least he's not embarrassing himself...
BartExp
Ultimate Member
https://www.law.com/nationallawjour...cting-solicitor-general-of-the-united-states/
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
He's not embarrassing himself, but he's not making a very good case either.
I thought it Roberts, but not sure. He only Justice to address that though.
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,202
you can only speak freely, think freely, be jewish or catholic or a cashew, be free from unwarranted search, in rural areas.
and only if you have a good reason. and because i want to is not good enough. and if it upsets other folks, then you can't do it.
and what was tradition on abortion... before roe v wade?
and only if you have a good reason. and because i want to is not good enough. and if it upsets other folks, then you can't do it.
and what was tradition on abortion... before roe v wade?
Agreed, and nor was she prepared for some of the rather easily anticipated questions.
While I'm feeling like a favorable ruling is coming, I worry about the next phase of restrictions. Like every state or even municipalities being able to decide what area's are off limits. If for example they ban carry within 100 yards of any county owned property it would make navigating the geography nearly impossible, and indirectly ban carry.
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,202
clement closing! man! mention castle rock!
this is better! much more aggressive and sounds on point.
this is better! much more aggressive and sounds on point.
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,202
"my friend" = translation when used in that context? "this a$$hole"?
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,202
very good closing!
Now we wait until June...
BartExp
Ultimate Member
Great closing.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
pcfixer
Ultimate Member
Court adjourned. Clemet had a great rebutle and closing.
I think that went pretty well. Most the time the Justices were busy poking holes in NY's argument - at least that's how it seemed at the time.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
Holosun DRS-NV (Digital Rifle Sight-Night Vision) In Stock (2 Viewers)- Started by MDElite
- Replies: 1
-
-
MD DNR Outdoor Recreation Survey -- Outdoorsman Responses Needed (3 Viewers)
- Started by Derwood
- Replies: 5
-
-