SAF-9th CA rules for 2A

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,476
    Westminster USA
    Surprising from the 9th circus.

    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​

    [FONT=&quot]Court Rules That Right To Buy, Sell Guns Protected By 2A In SAF Case!

    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]BELLEVUE, WA – A three-judge panel for the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a 2-1 ruling that “the right to purchase and sell firearms is part and parcel of the historically recognized right to keep and bear arms” protected by the Second Amendment in a case brought by the Second Amendment Foundation.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]SAF was joined in the case by the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, the Calguns Foundation, Inc., and three businessmen, John Teixeira, Steve Nobriga and Gary Gamaza. SAF was represented by noted California civil rights attorney Don Kilmer, and the case was supported by an important amicus brief filed by Virginia attorney Alan Gura for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Gura won both the Heller and McDonald Second Amendment rulings before the U.S. Supreme Court.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]“This is an important decision,” said SAF founder and CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. “It remands the case back to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with the ruling as it pertains to the Second Amendment.”[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]The lawsuit was against an Alameda County ordinance that prohibits gun stores from being located within 500 feet of a residential zone. Writing for the majority, Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain noted that, “the Ordinance burdened conduct protected by the Second Amendment and that it therefore must be subjected to heightened scrutiny—something beyond mere rational basis review.”[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]“Both SAF and CCRKBA can be proud of this victory,” Gottlieb stated. “We agree with Judge O’Scannlain’s explanation that ‘the county had failed to justify the burden it has placed on the right of law-abiding citizens to purchase guns. The Second Amendment,’ as the judge wrote, ‘requires something more rigorous than the unsubstantiated assertions offered to the district court.’”[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Quoting the Supreme Court ruling in SAF’s 2010 landmark McDonald case, Judge O’Scannlain reiterated, “The right of law-abiding citizens to keep and to bear arms is not a ‘second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees that we have held to be incorporated into the Due Process Clause.’”[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]


    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]The Second Amendment Foundation ( [/FONT][FONT=&quot][FONT=&quot]www.saf.org[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=&quot]) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. [/FONT]


    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot]< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >[/FONT]​
    Copyright © 2016 Second Amendment Foundation, All Rights Reserved.​
    [FONT=&quot]Second Amendment Foundation
    James Madison Building
    12500 N.E. Tenth Place
    Bellevue, WA 98005[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Voice: 425-454-7012
    Toll Free: 800-426-4302
    FAX: 425-451-3959
    email: InformationRequest@saf.org[/FONT]​


    [FONT=&quot]C[/FONT]

    -
     

    kcbrown

    Super Genius
    Jun 16, 2012
    1,393
    Note that both O'Scannlain and Bea are Republican appointees. So this decision shouldn't be entirely surprising. We already knew where O'Scannlain stands on the 2nd Amendment (from Peruta). Now we know where both Bea and Silverman stand (for and against, respectively).
     

    danb

    dont be a dumbass
    Feb 24, 2013
    22,704
    google is your friend, I am not.
    Note that both O'Scannlain and Bea are Republican appointees. So this decision shouldn't be entirely surprising. We already knew where O'Scannlain stands on the 2nd Amendment (from Peruta). Now we know where both Bea and Silverman stand (for and against, respectively).

    Some of the Reagan and Bush appointees appeared against us in Kolbe (MD weapons ban).

    Lest we forget, many republicans of that era were pro-weapons bans and signed on to the 1994 and 1986 bans. Many are also pro-states rights and view these as local issues. O'Scannlain is a different breed of R from that era.
     

    kcbrown

    Super Genius
    Jun 16, 2012
    1,393
    Some of the Reagan and Bush appointees appeared against us in Kolbe (MD weapons ban).

    Lest we forget, many republicans of that era were pro-weapons bans and signed on to the 1994 and 1986 bans. Many are also pro-states rights and view these as local issues. O'Scannlain is a different breed of R from that era.

    The support for the right to arms amongst Republican nominees at the appellate level is roughly 50%, and the degree of support seems to depend in part on how fundamental the question is (the more fundamental, the greater the support. But not always, as Kolbe illustrates).

    But that is in stark contrast to the Democrat nominees, which are, save for one, 100% against the right thus far.


    This is why I said one shouldn't be entirely surprised, particularly since O'Scannlain was already a known quantity in favor of the right, thus making a win here more likely than not, since the acquisition question is a fundamental one.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,514
    Messages
    7,284,754
    Members
    33,473
    Latest member
    Sarca

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom