MIBPreacher
Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 10
Whats the status of this AR? I bought it before Oct 1st 2013 deadline...
Whats the status of this AR? I bought it before Oct 1st 2013 deadline...
Whats the status of this AR? I bought it before Oct 1st 2013 deadline...
Whats the status of this AR? I bought it before Oct 1st 2013 deadline...
For some reason I have not received the replys I just read. (Figured it out not subscribed) I was concerned that my rifle was or will be banned. I read in the upcoming proposed laws about how you cant even transport rifles except to certain facilities or something like in New York. I love my AR but I was just wanting a second opinion on its legal status. I think its a medium not a HBAR
Same barrel thickness from the barrel nut to the gas block?
It’s good if’n it ain’t necked down.
I don't think the actual shape of the barrel is relevant.
MSP was given no guidance in the statute as to what defined a "heavy barrel", so for the moment it seems they have defaulted to:
1) is it marked as a heavy barrel
OR
2) is it marketed as a heavy barrel
Yes, this makes utterly no sense. But this is what happens when people who don't understand guns try to ban them.
These are the standards most LGSs use to sell AR15s. And, basically a CYA standard.
Yes, I am aware of this. My point was mainly that the actual barrel dimensions are apparently irrelevant.
It matters to me, and it oughta to anyone with more than a double digit IQ.I don't think the actual shape of the barrel is relevant.
MSP was given no guidance in the statute as to what defined a "heavy barrel", so for the moment it seems they have defaulted to:
1) is it marked as a heavy barrel
OR
2) is it marketed as a heavy barrel
Yes, this makes utterly no sense. But this is what happens when people who don't understand guns try to ban them.
EVERY “HBAR” rifle I ever saw had the same barrel profile, “stamped” or not, and that is with the same diameter from the barrel nut to the gas block. I’ll trust a measurement a heluva lot more than what some clueless overpaid politically appointed yinyang in a uniform might have to say because he’s too damn lazy to do a little research, and I’ll glady argue that in court if need be.
I don't know who you think is doing that. I'm acting like this is MSP's way of dealing with a law that tells them something is exempted but fails to actually define what that is.Now, if someone CHOOSES to go by them incredibly loose “standards” as a “just in case” or what have ya, that’s fine. I just think them that act like this is the Gospel accordin to John does themselves kind of a disservice.
[/SIZE][/FONT]