2A Maryland 2019 Session Information

Stoveman · Feb 18, 2019

welder516 said:
Okay , I seen a post saying he was . But that is fine , sometimes I am so confused

Look closer.

buellsfurn · Feb 18, 2019

I dislike whispers it's not polite

welder516 · Feb 18, 2019

buellsfurn said:
I dislike whispers it's not polite

If they want me to know they would tell me , I was thinking I was helping out .
But I will be over here if anyone needs me . :thumbsup:

jefflac02 · Feb 21, 2019

If anyone is at senate judicial today. Introduce yourself. I’m a mod 30’s guy in a blue suit with a maroon paisley tie. I’m jeff.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

scjamesm · Feb 21, 2019

Any word from today's session?

Malleovic · Feb 21, 2019

scjamesm said:
Any word from today's session?

Hearing for the transfer bill in Senate Judicial Proceedings committee has not happened yet.

hotdog · Feb 21, 2019

Here is the link:

http://mgahouse.maryland.gov/mga/pl...?catalog/03e481c7-8a42-4438-a7da-93ff74bdaa4c

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Schipperke · Feb 21, 2019

Not one person testified against shall issue. Zirkin was shocked that DC was shall issue. Hasn't that been over a year?

Malleovic · Feb 21, 2019

Schipperke said:
Zirkin was shocked that DC was shall issue. Hasn't that been over a year?

The may-issue states that bullied DC into not petitioning for cert have an interest in downplaying the significance of the decision.

Abacab · Feb 21, 2019

Schipperke said:
Not one person testified against shall issue. Zirkin was shocked that DC was shall issue. Hasn't that been over a year?

LMAO there's no way he didn't know

teratos · Feb 21, 2019

Schipperke said:
Not one person testified against shall issue.

The Moms must be getting some action......

Schipperke · Feb 21, 2019

Abacab said:
LMAO there's no way he didn't know

He was the same guy last year that was shocked we can bring standard magazines in to the state.

Sealion · Feb 21, 2019

Schipperke said:
He was the same guy last year that was shocked we can bring standard magazines in to the state.

And he's one of my reps...awesome.

Mike OTDP · Feb 21, 2019

Schipperke said:
Not one person testified against shall issue. Zirkin was shocked that DC was shall issue. Hasn't that been over a year?

I may be tilting at windmills, but I plan on testifying in favor of shall issue Monday. Someone must.

jefflac02 · Feb 21, 2019

Hopefully testimony today on SB346 poked so many holes in the bills that even a rat won’t touch that cheese. It was glorious. So good year by the time I got up to testify. Every single point I was going to make had already been touched on multiple times.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mrbob1000 · Feb 21, 2019

Just curious, who has some arguments at the ready for the 27th against the ban on 80% firearms and home manufacture? (SB08 and HB740)

teratos · Feb 21, 2019

mrbob1000 said:
Just curious, who has some arguments at the ready for the 27th against the ban on 80% firearms and home manufacture? (SB08 and HB740)

I’ve been racking my brain. Can’t think of anything stellar.

jefflac02 · Feb 21, 2019

mrbob1000 said:
Just curious, who has some arguments at the ready for the 27th against the ban on 80% firearms and home manufacture? (SB08 and HB740)

Overhearing the moms today while in the foyer waiting to testify. This bill and the lgql are their two banner infringements this session. Mentions of getting their members to blow up the phones of the legislators because their staff only relays for or against (for most reps). We really need to get support of opposition to blow up the phones.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

hodgepodge · Feb 21, 2019

mrbob1000 said:
Just curious, who has some arguments at the ready for the 27th against the ban on 80% firearms and home manufacture? (SB08 and HB740)

Banning these will have NO effect on mass shootings or any other crime! Manufacturing handguns is NOT how criminals obtain guns. This law will only affect a small number of firearm hobbyists who manufacture their own guns, usually at a higher cost than purchasing them.

mrbob1000 · Feb 21, 2019

So far in my emails and voicemail I've stressed:

The ban on home/craft built firearms without serial numbers, "ghost guns" as referenced in the bill, would require persons who had built their own firearms in accordance with federal and local laws to surrender their home/craft built firearms. These are incredibly popular firearms allowing the end user to customize their gun to meet their needs specifically. I constantly see home built rifles and handguns when I go to the range due to the ergonomic enhancements, customization, and hand tailoring that is only possible through home manufacture. If the law passes as written, these individuals would become criminals overnight due to their firearms they tailored to suit their individual needs.

Criminals aren't buying milling machines, drill presses, or learning be precision machinists to build guns, they're either buying them on the black market from other criminals or stealing them from peoples homes.

2A Maryland 2019 Session Information

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

TV Personality

Ultimate Member

Deplorable Welder

Active Member

Active Member

Active Member

Member

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Member

My hair is amazing

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Member

My hair is amazing

Active Member

Senior Member (Gold)

Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics