As Issued (I Think) IBM Carbine

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Combloc

    Stop Negassing me!!!!!
    Nov 10, 2010
    7,212
    In a House
    This little M1 carbine was a local out of the woodwork pickup. I saw it in early to mid October at a local shop, sitting in the gunsmith area. It wasn't for sale but my eye was instantly drawn to it so I asked if I could take a look at it and was given the go ahead. As I was blinking my eyes dumbfounded at the condition, I asked why it was sitting there. I was told that a guy had brought it in and it had been owned by his grandfather who had passed away. Apparently, he thought his granddad had brought back from the war and, while he wasn't a "gun guy" he thought it would look nice hanging up on the wall in a shadowbox. I think the chances of it being a bring back are zero. Rather, it's most likely an early DCM purchase. To that end, he had brought it to the shop to ask if they would shellac it to make it pretty and protect it. I about lost my breakfast when I heard that. I explained to the gunsmith that, if this was indeed legitimate, the Historical value was high and doing ANYTHING to it would destroy that History, not to mention a probable hefty monetary value. This thing was CRISP. I mean, it looked like it was built, put in storage and not touched since. The metal was bone dry, the lubricant had long since hardened and the Sprague & Carleton birch stock was still slightly rough, telling me it had probably never been issued. As I placed it back on the rack, I pleaded with the gunsmith to try and impress upon the owner that a carbine in this configuration and condition, if legit, was a rare find and that NOTHING other than storage should befall this little carbine. He thanked me for the information and conversation and agreed that shellacking this old relic would probably be a less than optimal decision. Then I was on my way, hoping that the owner knew what he had and would do the right thing. Fast forward about a month. Usually I stop in this shop every other week or so. The owners are as nice as can be, honest, fair and the conversation is always pleasant. They are the kind of people that I feel really do care about the customer more than they do the almighty dollar. I usually end up staying longer than I intended because of that and the fact that the shop dog is a cute, warm and friendly little guy. It's just a nice place to go on a Saturday morning after a breakfast with good friends. Well, sometimes life (and the flu) gets in the way and I hadn't made it to the shop for a bit but I was good to go this Saturday and looking forward to my visit. Imagine my surprise when I walked in and saw the little IBM up for sale on the rack. I didn't ask why the owner had decided to sell it but I did ask if I could disassemble it for a more thorough look. It was as nice on the inside as it was on the outside. I was trying to find something glaringly wrong because it just looked too good. I've just never seen one this pristine before. It almost HAD to be humped up. But, as I inspected each part for stamps, it looked right. I only found two things that were not textbook. One was the GE-Q marked rear sight and the other was an unmarked safety. Normally these sights were supplied to Quality Hardware, not IBM but I also know that they DO present on IBM's from time to time. In fact, there is a well documented IBM over at The Carbine Collectors Forum complete with the 1963 DCM paperwork and it has the same sight. As for the safety, I didn't let that stop me. Even though they are generally supposed to be maker marked on IBM's I've seen them before unmarked. Besides, everything else checked out so logic dictated that this was the safety installed when the carbine was built......if I read the rest correctly. Now, I'm no expert by a long shot but I have been at this since the 80's and you get a feel for things with experience. While crisp, everything presented as old and not messed with for a long time. And while I don't really collect US firearms (I do have a mixmaster NPM carbine as a representative for shooting), I figured I should take a gamble on this little guy if for no other reason than it should be saved. Besides, if it turned out that it wasn't legit, the price was right and I would still have a nice little carbine for plinking. So, that's where the following pictures come in. Again, TO ME, everything looks good to go. I think it's a 1944 IBM carbine that has never been reworked or messed with. I think it's as it left the factory 74 years ago but I would like to know what you guys have to say. If it's legit, I can't shoot it and I have to decide what to do at that point. If I read the markers wrong, I can shoot it and have fun with it. Please let me know. Usually, I put a bunch of text with the pictures explaining how things work and whet you are looking at. But that isn't necessary here because, if you are still reading this, you probably know what you are looking at already. So, I'm just posting a bunch of pictures. I will say that my poor photography skill do not show this little M1 as nice as it presents in the flesh. But, hopefully, I did a good enough job. I have not cleaned it (I don't think it was cleaned after the last time it was shot), oiled it or done anything else other than handle the parts with anything other then a rag that has been used in the past to apply Eezox. Otherwise, it's exactly as I brought it home. There are a BUNCH of pictures so this will take about 6 posts. So, please do let me know what you think and please let me know if you require any other pictures. However, there are a few things I did not and will not disassemble because either they would be a major pain (bolt) or I don't want to disturb them (recoil lug). Thank you!


























     
    Last edited:

    trailtoy

    GOA, MSI, NRA
    MDS Supporter
    May 19, 2013
    1,481
    St. Marys
    Wow. That is a beauty. Glad to see it is in good hands. It was hard but I read the whole thing before looking at the pics. Glad you got back before they sold it, that would have sucked.
     

    Jimbob2.0

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 20, 2008
    16,600
    Looks right to me either its as issued or someone has spent a lot of time on the details.

    Early configuration carbines are scarce. Whatever you paid it was worth it.
     

    MilsurpDan

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 1, 2012
    2,217
    Frederick County
    Wow! That’s really freaking nice! I hope I could find one that nice some day. Right now I just have a CMP Underwood and a refurb IBM.

    M1 Carbines are probably my favorite Mil-Surp rifle to shoot
     
    Jul 1, 2012
    5,711
    Overall gorgeous; the only thing that stands out to me is how aggressively the rear sight is staked, to the point of marring the sight itself (GE-Q would be ok).
    I"m no IBM expert, other makes I've seen use a simple round punch-mark for staking, not a big rectangular chisel, and not on all 4 corners.
    According to the Larson book, it's almost at the end of IBM production and should probably have the Type II (milled) or III "IRCO" (stamped) adjustable rear sight.
     

    Combloc

    Stop Negassing me!!!!!
    Nov 10, 2010
    7,212
    In a House
    ………. the only thing that stands out to me is how aggressively the rear sight is staked, to the point of marring the sight itself (GE-Q would be ok).
    I"m no IBM expert, other makes I've seen use a simple round punch-mark for staking, not a big rectangular chisel, and not on all 4 corners.
    According to the Larson book, it's almost at the end of IBM production and should probably have the Type II (milled) or III "IRCO" (stamped) adjustable rear sight.

    The rear sight and the staking is my biggest concern too. As to the sight itself, the other carbine is referenced has a serial number only 3505 less than mine. In my mind, that's a good argument for my sight being correct and probably just before they switched over. According to USCARBINECAL30M1.com, the switchover from the Type 1 to the Type 2 was around serial nr. 3963999 so I should be ok there. The staking......ah the staking. I didn't mention that because, as I'm sure you know, it's a pretty big controversy amongst carbine collectors; or at least it used to be. I don't keep up on some things. Some guys say Type 1's should not be staked, others say yes. You see no stake, punch staked and chisel staked (seen on this one). You see every thing from barely a nick to pretty aggressive and all of it raises a lot of hackles. My personal opinion is this. I don't think Type 1's were staked when they left the factory. I think they were staked in the field by armorers when issued or at the depot level. I'm sure that will cause a commotion to some collectors and they would argue me until the end of time. In the end, I don't think anyone REALLY knows nor will they ever at this point. The fact that this one is so aggressively chisel staked is the number one concern I have about this IBM but the fact is, I'll probably never know for sure. As I said, some collectors will accept the staking and some won't. I will say that my hypothesis would explain the wide variety of stakes (or lack thereof) but maybe I'm just rationalizing. IF it did have a T1 sight on it when it left the factory, I think it would have been this exact sight. To me, the only question here is, was it staked 70 odd years ago or after it was bought from the DCM? I'll never know. Thank you very much for your insight. I know you know your stuff! :thumbsup:
     

    jjbduke2004

    Ultimate Member
    Oct 19, 2008
    1,764
    Morris Oblast, NJ SSR
    I'm thinking that's very close to as-issued. It still has the flip sight and no bayonet lug. Those were the first things to be added in the post-war rebuilds. MY CMP carbines went to Italy and have Italian stocks and markings. Those are GI cartouches. I'm thinking it may indeed have come home or somehow made it to CMP without once going through overhaul and updates.
     
    Jul 1, 2012
    5,711
    I'd say there's about zero possibility it was staked like that at the factory, but in-field "adjustment" may be more plausible.
    Either way it's a really nice one with great wood :)
    So glad it was rescued from a shellacking.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    274,919
    Messages
    7,258,869
    Members
    33,349
    Latest member
    christian04

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom