Received letter today from BATFE regarding purchase from Diversified Machine

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    50,036
    If Diversified Machine shipped him something that the ATF already considered a suppressor, it does not matter if he had his stamp. You cannot use a form 1 to order in a complete SBR, for example; it is permission to MANUFACTURE, not to transfer. If I ship you a Colt 6933 with no form 4, the ATF is going to be busting you and me for it even if you had a form 1 to build an SBR.

    The "lol **** the ATF crowd" really does not seem to understand the nuances of the law. I'd strongly advise consulting a lawyer before blowing this off.

    OP did not buy a complete suppressor. Machine work by the OP was required in order to arrive at a complete suppressor. The OP purchased said parts in good faith from a reputable(arguably) company.

    A Colt 6933 without a stock attached is nothing more than a pistol, is it not?
     

    calicojack

    American Sporting Rifle
    MDS Supporter
    May 29, 2018
    5,416
    Cuba on the Chesapeake
    In defense of the OP, the ATF letter does not (to me at least) make it clear the nuance between transferring and building a form 1 item. Seems to me OP did in good faith register his NFA item. IDK, my take as a non-lawyer.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    OP did not buy a complete suppressor. Machine work by the OP was required in order to arrive at a complete suppressor. The OP purchased said parts in good faith from a reputable(arguably) company.



    A Colt 6933 without a stock attached is nothing more than a pistol, is it not?
    The ATF is disagreeing. They are saying what you bought was suppressor parts, and that was illegal. You want to fight it out in court with them, go for it.

    Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
     

    calicojack

    American Sporting Rifle
    MDS Supporter
    May 29, 2018
    5,416
    Cuba on the Chesapeake
    The ATF is disagreeing. They are saying what you bought was suppressor parts, and that was illegal. You want to fight it out in court with them, go for it.

    Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk

    This is why we need in this country LEGAL legalization of suppressors. My goodness, even Socialist Britain allows gun owners to buy suppressors.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    This is why we need in this country LEGAL suppressors. My goodness, even Socialist Britain allows gun owners to buy suppressors.
    Please don't think I agree with the ATF or NFA. I am only trying to explain the situation as it is, since so many people here don't seem to understand it.

    Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
     
    The first post includes a very generic form letter that I'd be willing to bet went out to a metric shit ton of DM's customers. The OP, in the same post, clarified he had his tax stamp prior to placing the order.
    The above being stated, I believe this is a big nothing burger. If I were the OP, I would let the BATFE know he received their letter and had a Form 1 tax stamp in hand prior to purchasing the silencer/suppressor parts.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    You guys keep not understanding that a form 1 doesn't give you permission to buy suppressor parts.

    Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
     
    You guys keep not understanding that a form 1 doesn't give you permission to buy suppressor parts.

    Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk

    I fully understand what you're saying, but I disagree with the way they are randomly choosing what is the suppressor part du jour. I think we would all agree that buying baffles with holes already drilled would be a suppressor part. From there it gets hazy.
    When I bought my threaded titanium tube from SD Tactical, was I buying a suppressor part or a piece of threaded titanium tube? How about freeze plugs from Napa?
    Recently I bought a tube and titanium cups from Quietbore. They required a copy of my Form 1 and engraved the tube for me before mailing it out. How in God's Green Earth is that not buying suppressor parts with a Form 1?
    What we're debating is the randomness of the ATF's interpretations.
     

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,838
    Bel Air
    ToolAA, in your research, have you found an ATF determination letter?
     

    ToolAA

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 17, 2016
    10,587
    God's Country
    Recently I bought a tube and titanium cups from Quietbore. They required a copy of my Form 1 and engraved the tube for me before mailing it out. How in God's Green Earth is that not buying suppressor parts with a Form 1?
    What we're debating is the randomness of the ATF's interpretations.

    I think this is a great point. Frankly had Diversified Machine asked for a copy of my Form-1 I could have provided it, and the transaction would have been essentially identical to what you describe from Quietbore. As a Form-1 holder at the time of the transaction my legal status shouldn’t be in question..

    I think from the ATF’s standpoint there are ”potentially” thousands of persons who did by parts from DM who MAY NOT have had the legal authorization to create suppressors. That potential is what creates this CYA blanket form letter to be sent to everyone. It’s in essence a presumption of guilt action. It’s lazy enforcement at best. However, I’m no fool, just because some agency is acting in a lazy manner, doesn’t mean anyone receiving a letter should.

    I’ve been reading anecdotal reports on Reddit where some have called the number and have reported their Form-1 status, and have been told they are in good standing. Sounds like BS to me. If it’s not in writing it doesn’t count. I suspect there are many people who are having lawyers craft responses. I would also expect that it will take a full year before the BAFTE actually responds back, if at all.
     

    TrappedinMD

    Active Member
    Dec 15, 2011
    857
    Western MD
    Fwiw the letter has no phone number, if you try calling you go thru several layers of automation before the system hangs up on you. A 2A lawyers paid opinion is this is just a phishing operation.
     

    Oneqwickr6

    Member
    Feb 8, 2013
    60
    I think anyone with a form 1 competed before they manufacted there suppressor is fine and should be worry free. from what I have read on Reddit several of the guys have talked to there ATF field branch and were told if they got form 1s they were fine. Take that for what you will I think they are going after people that completed them without a form 1. Quietbore has stated that they have approval from the ATF to continue with there sales the way they are conducting now with an uploaded form 1. Quietbore is also a FFL SOT and if the ATF felt those items should be transferred on the form 4 and not sold to customers with a form 1 then they would not of given them the ok to continue doing business the way they are now.
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    All I'm saying is why would the ATF let someone sell, as you call them, suppressor parts and then go after the people who bought those parts in good faith?

    For me, I did not join the Form1 suppressor build band wagon.
    They wouldn't. But they also wouldn't let them keep them.

    Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    50,036
    We’ll clearly now, you are missing out on all of the fun…

    Evidently.

    So DM was raided about a year ago and now they're going after everyone who ordered at least one part intended for use in a suppressor. From what I am reading, it has nothing to do with a "complete kit" for building a suppressor. From the original definition from the 1968 NFA "...combination of parts, designed or redesigned,..." Well shit, that would make any Form1 suppressor illegal. Or am I reading it wrong(see underlined)?

    https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/a...ters-to-thousands-of-silencer-part-consumers/


    This is where we are now. :popcorn:
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,722
    Columbia
    OP did not buy a complete suppressor. Machine work by the OP was required in order to arrive at a complete suppressor. The OP purchased said parts in good faith from a reputable(arguably) company.

    A Colt 6933 without a stock attached is nothing more than a pistol, is it not?


    Exactly.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    babalou

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 12, 2013
    16,172
    Glenelg
    agreed

    In defense of the OP, the ATF letter does not (to me at least) make it clear the nuance between transferring and building a form 1 item. Seems to me OP did in good faith register his NFA item. IDK, my take as a non-lawyer.

    I agree
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,542
    Messages
    7,285,801
    Members
    33,475
    Latest member
    LikeThatHendrix

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom