jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
They signed an application to carry concealed firearms, which isn't the protected right. So in essence, they waived their right to challenge them on open carry, which is the protected right.
You need to go study some more. Certain rights are most definitely waived when that application for, ANY license, is signed on the dotted line.
Funny thing is, even if financed by someone else, you certainly wouldn't do that. I actually told Alan Korwin at a Phoenix gun show that I would do just that back in the mid 90's. He had just told me he was rubbing elbows with Justice Thomas at some event in DC. Yet, when I told him, I would go anywhere and open carry without a license if he could set it up with one of the big gun clubs, he went directly to, oh, well, yeah, I can't really help you with that. I was living in my truck back then, so no need for financing for my living expenses. You can't even get retired chest pounding gun rights guys, who could spend 10yrs in jail without worry of their finances, to ever do that. Had someone with kahuna's taken a machine gun case soon after the Miller case, we wouldn't be where we're at with semi-auto's. But if you finance me $3000 a month while I'm sitting in jail on an open carry charge, and finance the case all the way to the SCOTUS, I'll walk down the middle of Time Square open carrying a, home built holstered handgun.
This case is about whether concealed carry is really part of the right. I suspect that SCOTUS will state that it is part of the right, but it is difficult to tell given the arguments that have been presented.
I don't seem to recall where the respondents (Bruen) claim that certain rights have been waived due to the application. Can you point out where they argue that point.
I don't know where to study something that is not true. Since you raised the issue about rights being waived based on an application for a license you should provide a basis for your claim.
It sounds like you are blaming other people for not having "any kahuna's to open carry without a license". If what you are claiming is true, you should not have any problems.