Hmm, it seems as if the last law they passed just expired Monday. I wonder what replaced it...if anything?
http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/searchbylegislation.aspx
http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/searchbylegislation.aspx
Novus, what's the legislation number?
This is just bizarre. Could it possibly be that DC allowed those emergency acts to expire without having follow-on legislation? Seriously - if that's the case, what are the implications? Without an active law on the books and the gun ban overturned, wouldn't that make things wide open in DC?
I perused both of those articles and it just blows my mind how some people think. There is this idea that if guns are allowed in the District, then somehow all of those law abiding gun owners who follow the rules in both obtaining and keeping those guns are all of a sudden going to turn criminal and threaten the lives of everyone around them. Furthermore, they completely ignore the fact that criminals in the District already possess and criminally use the very guns they fear - it just doesn't make sense.I know there is a big debat on whether they are going to pass the DC voting bill with the amendment to strip the DC gun ban or if those who were for it are going to cower and let it pass without it.
DC Vote vs DC BAN
Latest Report
I'm certainly no expert so my thoughts on the matter don't really count for much, but with the gun ban being overturned with the SCOTUS decison on Heller. vs DC, I would tend to think that they can't revert to those laws because they are unconstitutional.According to the Council website emergency legislation expires 90 days after approval, so I would say the law is dead. Which should mean that DC reverts to the prior gun laws on the books, Im not sure if that is the pre-Heller law or the post Heller stupidity, but basically a more restrictive variant if Im thinking correctly.
Which would suit them just fine
http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/faq.aspx#9
Agreed. Anyone going to volunteer to call the Sun or the Post?I disagree with not exposing this. It is likely that if there really is a lapse in law, they are hoping like fricken hell no one is noticing before they can get something in place in time, but if we expose this and people realize there really is no law in place, they will be caught in a huge embarassment and it will shower much media attention on them yet again.
Hell, it might lead to even more lawsuits if some people try to register guns in this time frame and are refused or are made to pay a fee for something that does not exist.
Agreed. Anyone going to volunteer to call the Sun or the Post?
I disagree with not exposing this. It is likely that if there really is a lapse in law, they are hoping like fricken hell no one is noticing before they can get something in place in time, but if we expose this and people realize there really is no law in place, they will be caught in a huge embarassment and it will shower much media attention on them yet again.
Hell, it might lead to even more lawsuits if some people try to register guns in this time frame and are refused or are made to pay a fee for something that does not exist.