Depending on the party in power, CDC has been a mixed blessing, but I agree, WE THE PEOPLE got nothing ... but the bill.Art of the Deal...Give (NICS, though could be argued a good thing), Give (CDC Research which will be biased). Get (Nada).
Reciprocity, Suppressors off of NFA were 2 Bills that could have gotten into the Get category...
The gun control debate is certainly worth reopening. But if we’re going to reopen it, let’s not just rethink the politics. Let’s take another look at the facts. Earlier this year, President Obama ordered the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the existing research on gun violence and recommend future studies. That report, prepared by the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council, is now complete. Its findings won’t entirely please the Obama administration or the NRA, but all of us should consider them. Here’s a list of the 10 most salient or surprising takeaways.
How is the CDC the right authority to do a study on gun violence. How is it a disease? Yes they should study mental health and violence. But not gun violence
Does the dept of interior get to do studies on Space travel?
I lean strongly towards the John Lott school of thought ...
Republicans really aren't much better than Democrats anymore - Ronald Reagan weeps.
What gun control, *specifically*, does this spending bill have in it?
Increased spending for the CDC to "study" gun control? Increased scrutiny with NICs? (organizations who don't report get punished, now?) Is that it?