randomuser
Ultimate Member
The antis already have a roadmap. It just takes time to drive across the country. Look at California.
The antis already have a roadmap. It just takes time to drive across the country. Look at California.
BINGO!!!
Anyone on MDS that thinks the antis don't get intel from this site are either fooling themselves or are fools. For some reason, we keep handing them all the info they need to further their agenda. On Thursday, there were 400+ guests reading the HBAR thread at the same time. That was not 400 random readers.
ETA- As I type this, there are 8 members and 3 guests watching this thread. During "bankers hours" that number may realistically be 8 members and 400 guests.
I can think of several ways "Red Flag" Law, tipped off. Personally, I believe if they pass such a law they will have to grandfather everyone from the date enacted backwards. And think for a moment if the overall affect of data mining if you have access or create access for certain information. I dare not say more.
I think that's probably his reason for suggesting it.
The "pay to play" idea goes over like a lead balloon too. I've regrettably suggested (at least) a premium membership as a way to raise funds and also keep a portion of the content semi-private'ish. I got backlash from bottom all the way to the literal top (at the time).
Some here believe there are spys among us and there might be...but there are plenty of ways to get info to further any nefarious agenda. ..and I personally don't give a rat's ass if the libs see what they might consider threats. I'm quit sure if they come here to spy, they probably have enough posts to enter the WC.
Post count isn't the answer (at all).Some here believe there are spys among us and there might be...but there are plenty of ways to get info to further any nefarious agenda. ..and I personally don't give a rat's ass if the libs see what they might consider threats. I'm quit sure if they come here to soy, they probably have enough posts to enter the WC.
I was one of those 400+ guests. I'm not letting my employer's key logging software record my password.
Anyone on MDS that thinks the antis don't get intel from this site are either fooling themselves or are fools.
If the Annapolis Commies read the board, then that makes it a lot easier for us to directly communicate with our "representatives."
Are we really sure they can read?
One more reason to be concerned about HB0740- not only will there be no more 80 lowers or anything else non-trackable, existing 80 builds will need to get serialized and (I assume) put into the system.No point being cagey about it, MDSP knows what their authorities are already. Anything you bought from any regulated firearms dealer in-state either is known to, or can be easily discovered by, the State of MD.
Are we really sure they can read?
Does anyone remember the "beltway sniper" case in October, 2002? MSP knocked on the door of everyone who had bought an AR-15 AFTER THAT MODEL HAD BECOME A "REGULATED FIREARM". Those who owned an AR-15 when it was just a "rifle" didn't get visited.
Federal law prohibits the federal government from maintaining computer records of firearms purchasers. Of course, there is no restriction on what MSP can keep.
One more reason to be concerned about HB0740- not only will there be no more 80 lowers or anything else non-trackable, existing 80 builds will need to get serialized and (I assume) put into the system.
They are trying to force everyone to "get on the list".
No, they will be banned. There will be no serializing. The law bans any firearm made that doesn’t have a serial number from a licensed manufacturer or importer. I assume you are neither.
How is this not a taking under the 5th amendment? You can't sell an unserialized firearm before the deadline because that's illegal under federal law. If we also have no avenue to serialize the thing legally before the deadline, AND there's no grandfather clause (since the date specified was 86), we're stuck with destroying the thing, which denies us any value from ownership of the property.
How is this not a taking under the 5th amendment? You can't sell an unserialized firearm before the deadline because that's illegal under federal law. If we also have no avenue to serialize the thing legally before the deadline, AND there's no grandfather clause (since the date specified was 86), we're stuck with destroying the thing, which denies us any value from ownership of the property.
They already set that precedent. With Bumpstocks.