Cody WIlson v State Department

CrabcakesAndFootball · Jul 31, 2018

Allen65 said:
Anybody have a link to the actual order?

I'm looking too. Can't wait to see the mental gymnastics of an activist judge granting a TRO to plaintiffs with absolutely no chance whatsoever at showing standing. Absolutely ridiculous. These district court judges deserve an earful from SCOTUS soon about these baseless nationwide injunctions they issue with regularity.

daNattyFatty · Jul 31, 2018

Jim12 said:
Charles Payne on FBN (Fios 617) interviewing DDI's attorney after commercial break. Now.

What did he say?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Jim12 · Jul 31, 2018

He just got order, too, and is reviewing it.

It's a First Amendment case, not Second Amendment. This is dissemination of information. Blue states are trying to impose a prior restraint against free speech. He mentioned Pentagon Papers case, where SCOTUS unanimously held that you can't restrain speech (of NYT in that case) that's in public domain.

Also, governors of one state can't regulate commerce or speech in another state, which is what these "blue states" are trying to do.

He said the files are already available online from several other sources and can be found with a five-minute Google search, yet his client is the only one being sued.

rbird7282 · Jul 31, 2018

There needs to be a method other than impeachment (because it never happens) to remove Federal judges who don't follow the Constitution.
These people are destroying our country.

East2West · Jul 31, 2018

rbird7282 said:
There needs to be a method other than impeachment (because it never happens) to remove Federal judges who don't follow the Constitution.
These people are destroying our country.

There is, but it would be inappropriate to advocate for it in polite company.

Jim12 · Jul 31, 2018

rbird7282 said:
There needs to be a method other than impeachment (because it never happens) to remove Federal judges who don't follow the Constitution.
These people are destroying our country.

Gotta keep the nuts from being appointed in the first place.

By custom, the home state US Senators in which district judges will sit have a say in the nomination, resulting in liberal appointments in liberal states. That's not how the Framers set it up, and it leads to politicization of the federal judiciary from the get-go.

https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=7733

rbird7282 · Jul 31, 2018

East2West said:
There is, but it would be inappropriate to advocate for it in polite company.

I was referring to a legal method......

East2West · Jul 31, 2018

Serious question. When the 9th Circuit ruled that Hawaii couldnt ban open carry, that didnt automatically make it legal to open carry across the country. How does a Judge from the Western District of Washington get to stop the release of this information outside of his district?

rbird7282 · Jul 31, 2018

East2West said:
Serious question. When the 9th Circuit ruled that Hawaii couldnt ban open carry, that didnt automatically make it legal to open carry across the country. How does a Judge from the Western District of Washington get to stop the release of this information outside of his district?

He doesn't. He may think he can until an appeals court smacks him down.
(I hope so anyways, I have little faith in our court system these days)

press1280 · Jul 31, 2018

East2West said:
Serious question. When the 9th Circuit ruled that Hawaii couldnt ban open carry, that didnt automatically make it legal to open carry across the country. How does a Judge from the Western District of Washington get to stop the release of this information outside of his district?

It's a federal law, not a state law like CA open carry. But this is the typical judge shopping by liberals. They always run to liberal districts.

elwojo · Jul 31, 2018

https://mobile.twitter.com/JoshMBlackman/status/1024448942577274881

Anarchists break laws all the time - so we might as well not treat them as people with rights. - Lasnik (WA Judge)

Better tell him about Republicans and Democrats and mothers and fathers and...well everyone. We all break laws. Because laws are written in a manner to control rather than empower.

DC-W · Jul 31, 2018

https://twitter.com/radomysisky/status/1024460056111267841?s=21

By order of a federal judge in the Western District of Washington, DEFCAD.com is going dark.

Archived links to the files are literally in the replies to that tweet, haha.

jcutonilli · Jul 31, 2018

DC-W said:
https://twitter.com/radomysisky/status/1024460056111267841?s=21

Archived links to the files are literally in the replies to that tweet, haha.

The site is not really dark either

This page (https://defcad.com/) is currently offline. However, because the site uses Cloudflare's Always Online™ technology you can continue to surf a snapshot of the site. We will keep checking in the background and, as soon as the site comes back, you will automatically be served the live version. Always Online™ is powered by Cloudflare | Hide this Alert

DC-W · Jul 31, 2018

jcutonilli said:
The site is not really dark either

And destruction breeds creation.

Another has come forth!
http://codeisfreespeech.com/

PowPow · Jul 31, 2018

rbird7282 said:
There needs to be a method other than impeachment (because it never happens) to remove Federal judges who don't follow the Constitution.
These people are destroying our country.

There is.

Article III
Section 1.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

Congress can simply ordain a different lower court system. This includes both districts and circuits. After all, it says "from time to time". Now would be a good time.

rbird7282 · Jul 31, 2018

PowPow said:
There is.

Congress can simply ordain a different lower court system. This includes both districts and circuits. After all, it says "from time to time". Now would be a good time.

Problem with that is I don’t trust Congress to fix anything, they’re part of the problem when it comes to judges.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PowPow · Jul 31, 2018

rbird7282 said:
Problem with that is I don’t trust Congress to fix anything, they’re part of the problem when it comes to judges.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course, but a way does exist within the constitution as it currently reads. Impeach or reorganize. Apart from that, it's on to amend.,

AssMan · Jul 31, 2018

Better ban chemistry books too.

WeaponsCollector · Jul 31, 2018

Enemies of our second amendment are also enemies of our first amendment. They in fact hate the entire bill of rights.

DC-W · Aug 1, 2018

The order
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4624030/WDWA-3D-20180731.pdf

Cody WIlson v State Department

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Active Member

Ultimate Member

Let Freedom Ring

Ultimate Member

Banned

Let Freedom Ring

Ultimate Member

Banned

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

File not found: M:/Liberty.exe

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Where's the beef?

Ultimate Member

Where's the beef?

Meh...

EXTREME GUN OWNER

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics