In just over a month 118 Red Flag PO’s

Hawkeye said:

All of your other posts in this thread except these last few say it is. If it isn't, explain it to us. Give us some evidence. Support it.



Not particularly, no. I just try to keep things polite, and I think it's nice when others can do so also.



And this is again evidence of where the problem lies in this discussion. I posted my opinion which I drew from what you wrote, and you decided that I'm intentionally spreading falsehoods or lies about you, when all I'm doing is saying something that you don't agree with. And for the umpteenth time, rather than continuing the discussion and saying "that's not what I meant, let me explain..." you got angry and accusatory. You have a history of getting upset and confrontational whenever people post stuff that you don't like, and I see this as another example of that. I'm not offended, I'm a big boy and words don't particularly bother me, especially internet words, but I just think that it's unfortunate that we can't have a discussion where people disagree with you without your getting upset about it.



No kidding.

Click to expand...

IDFInfantry said:

I told you guys this was going to happen! States are now starting to use children to confiscate guns from parents.

[YT]wOE259N75yI[/YT]

Click to expand...

RoadDawg said:

You still can’t admit that what you said was false. When it is blatantly false.

Click to expand...

Hawkeye said:

Because it's not false. What I posted is what I read from your repeated assertions that based on your own experience, all cops operate a certain way.

Again, if you think I got the wrong idea, provide some supporting evidence.

There is a difference between a misunderstanding or a misreading and a falsehood. It would be a "damn lie" if I posted something like "you said yesterday that you let a guy off the hook who shot five people" because that's demonstrably factually not true. What you're getting so upset about here is my read of what you've said, repeatedly, in many threads. If I'm misunderstanding what you said, please, explain why or how instead of continually accusing me of lying.

Click to expand...

Doco Overboard said:

I just watched that Shaver video. Why didn't they just go over and cuff that kid when he was face down instead of instructions for all the acrobatics?
Normally I wouldn't comment in such an interesting thread but jeez o whiz that was some pretty stupid stuff right there.
On both parties behalf from I can ascertain.

Click to expand...

Schipperke said:

Glad that was cleared that up. The 1% speculation had me cringing.

Click to expand...

clandestine said:

DeVos and her Agency is pushing for a national Red Flag Law

Click to expand...

Adder said:

A lot of people have posted some excellent points about this unconstitutional law.

I just learned there are two places in Maryland for temporary or long term gun and ammo storage. If you know of someone that is in need of storage (Red Flag, getting divorced, selling house, etc) you may want to tell them about this place. www.gunsitters.com There is one in Montgomery County, one on the Eastern Shore and one in Pennsylvania -- I wish there was one in Charles County where I live.

This law puts the police and law abiding citizens and their families at risk. What do you all think of getting this law on a state wide referendum to repeal it? I'd like to here what you think we can do to repeal of this law and prevent expansion like what is happening with magazines over 10 in New Jersey.

To the Police, Military and Security Personnel who read this thank you for protecting our society.

Click to expand...

Hawkeye said:

Because it's not false. What I posted is what I read from your repeated assertions that based on your own experience, all cops operate a certain way.

Again, if you think I got the wrong idea, provide some supporting evidence.

There is a difference between a misunderstanding or a misreading and a falsehood. It would be a "damn lie" if I posted something like "you said yesterday that you let a guy off the hook who shot five people" because that's demonstrably factually not true. What you're getting so upset about here is my read of what you've said, repeatedly, in many threads. If I'm misunderstanding what you said, please, explain why or how instead of continually accusing me of lying.

Click to expand...

What I posted is what I read from your repeated assertions that based on your own experience, all cops operate a certain way.

Click to expand...

clandestine said:

There are members here who say this wouldn't or won't happen.


Those people are our enemy.

Click to expand...

Adder said:

Excellent points! I also wonder if there will be a wrongful death lawsuit for Gary Willis.

Click to expand...

clandestine said:

DeVos and her Agency is pushing for a national Red Flag Law

Click to expand...

IDFInfantry said:

I told you guys this was going to happen! States are now starting to use children to confiscate guns from parents.

[YT]wOE259N75yI[/YT]

Click to expand...

Doctor_M said:

Here's a hypothetical I've been thinking about based on the threads for the Ruger .22 pistol that went full auto, and the former cop in Carroll County that got busted for modifying rifles for full auto.

We all know that a gun, even one that unintentionally fires full auto with no intent to convert, us no bruno with the feds. What if someone were red flagged and a sizable collection is seized. The person goes through all of the after the fact crap to clear themselves and get their property back only to be told, sorry, we found that 3 of your rifles fired full auto. Even if it can't be reproduced, that person is likely in for a lot of leagal trouble and expense. How the heck would someone even begin to defend themselves from such a charge, whether legitimate or fabricated. There are lots of unforeseen shenanigans that might ensue once your arms are out of your control. Rocky waters ahead.

Click to expand...