In just over a month 118 Red Flag PO’s

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • East2West

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Jul 20, 2013
    902
    Nomalley, Nobama
    No...

    I am NOT "triggered". Your try... failed. :shrug:

    Why can't you just ask a question without the personally offensive and confrontational ********?

    What I am... is disgusted with folks who prefer to pick a fight with those who did not create nor ask for this law... rather than those who DID. But go ahead and keep shooting at the messengers. I'm sure that will work out real well for you.

    Why can't you pick a fight with both?
    Could the law be enforced if there was no one to enforce it?
     

    Not_an_outlaw

    Ultimate Member
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 26, 2013
    4,679
    Prince Frederick, MD
    This is a question for RD. Has there been an example where an LEO has refused to act or failed to act contrary to a current law that was fired? Then that law was adjudicated in a higher court and found to be in violation to the Constitution. Did the LEO get his job back and damages?

    I imagine this went one a bunch on the civil rights activities in the 60s, but is there a current example?
     

    basscat

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 23, 2012
    1,398
    No...

    I am NOT "triggered". Your try... failed. :shrug:

    Why can't you just ask a question without the personally offensive and confrontational ********?

    What I am... is disgusted with folks who prefer to pick a fight with those who did not create nor ask for this law... rather than those who DID. But go ahead and keep shooting at the messengers. I'm sure that will work out real well for you.

    Problem is that LEO's are not the messengers, they are the enforcers. Big difference.
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,450
    Says the guy who voted for Hogan, who asked for this law and signed it with glee.

    Says the guy who fails to see that others may not share their opinion on every issue.

    I voted FOR anything that kept the Socialist out of the Statehouse.

    Just like when I voted to keep the Brownstain out of the Statehouse.

    You don't like that? I don't care... Go ahead and hate me because I did not vote like you chose to vote... I don't give a shit...

    But... what I will NOT do... is hate you back. :shrug: Sorry... not worth it.
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,450
    Problem is that LEO's are not the messengers, they are the enforcers. Big difference.

    In this case they are BOTH. And are forced by their duty to act on orders from the Courts.

    But... any excuse to be hatin on the PoPo...

    If folks want the LEOs to sympathize with them on this and any other issues... Stop spitting in their face while trying to get them to hear your point. :shrug:

    It really IS that simple.
     

    ironpony

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 8, 2013
    7,257
    Davidsonville
    Cut the shit guys. Same team and this is what the antis are trying to accomplish.

    In other news I just read Glock is producing a 7 rnd mag given recent bills being introduced.
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,450
    Cut the shit guys. Same team and this is what the antis are trying to accomplish.

    In other news I just read Glock is producing a 7 rnd mag given recent bills being introduced.

    I have said that several times... :shrug:
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,091
    Cut the shit guys. Same team and this is what the antis are trying to accomplish.

    In other news I just read Glock is producing a 7 rnd mag given recent bills being introduced.

    That doesn't negate the fact that even trained LEO's under pressure in a confrontation hit their intended target only 2 out of every 10 rounds.

    Are citizens in the heat of trying to defend themselves and their families supposed to be better shots than LEOs are, supposed to convince their attackers to advance one at a time, and/or supposed to convince their attackers to wait while they reload after missing?
     

    Moon

    M-O-O-N, that spells...
    Jan 4, 2013
    2,367
    In Orbit
    Cut the shit guys. Same team and this is what the antis are trying to accomplish.

    In other news I just read Glock is producing a 7 rnd mag given recent bills being introduced.

    I'm not on the same team as someone who votes away my rights.
     

    basscat

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 23, 2012
    1,398
    In this case they are BOTH. And are forced by their duty to act on orders from the Courts.

    But... any excuse to be hatin on the PoPo...

    If folks want the LEOs to sympathize with them on this and any other issues... Stop spitting in their face while trying to get them to hear your point. :shrug:

    It really IS that simple.

    Not hating at all. Just stating facts. I don't see anyone spitting in their faces. Not sure how your reading that into all these posts. The gun community has always been the most vocal supporters of law enforcement. I don't see any bashing here but I do see a lot of concern going forward.
     

    East2West

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Jul 20, 2013
    902
    Nomalley, Nobama
    I'm not on the same team as someone who votes away my rights.

    2nd

    No teammate of mine knowingly votes for, supports or enforces immoral & unconstitutional laws. No one in "Free America" is forced to vote for, support or enforce such laws. They do so under their own free will.
     

    Tungsten

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 1, 2012
    7,292
    Elkridge, Leftistan
    If folks want the LEOs to sympathize with them on this and any other issues... Stop spitting in their face while trying to get them to hear your point. :shrug:

    It really IS that simple.

    Just for the record- "That guy" wasn't spitting in anyone's face when trying to make his point heard.
     

    Attachments

    • jeff.jpg
      jeff.jpg
      37.1 KB · Views: 197

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,450
    Just for the record- "That guy" wasn't spitting in anyone's face when trying to make his point heard.
    Just for the record ... I NEVER SAID, INFERRED, NOR IMPLIED THAT HE WAS.

    I happen to have a great respect for him and I never see HIM attacking or trash talking LEOs because they have a job to do. :cool:

    HE happens to be one who is working to change things in a POSITIVE manner.
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,450
    2nd

    No teammate of mine knowingly votes for, supports or enforces immoral & unconstitutional laws. No one in "Free America" is forced to vote for, support or enforce such laws. They do so under their own free will.

    And you apparently believe that you are THE ultimate Authority on matters of Constitutionality of laws. And therefore in a position to judge all others in the matter. :lol2:

    I am not one who will "knowingly vote for someone who can not possibly defeat those who would do worse to us".

    Damage control is a MUST... EVEN when it is not what one wants to do or see done. Every battle is not a war... We must pick and choose those which we can win... EVEN when we use the enemy to do so.

    [deleted]
     

    Moon

    M-O-O-N, that spells...
    Jan 4, 2013
    2,367
    In Orbit
    I have said that several times... :shrug:

    You voted for someone who you know is a gun grabber.
    You have publicly excoriated anyone who refused to do the same.
    You voted for Larry Hogan, who is left of Bill Clinton.

    No one should be on your side.
     

    RoadDawg

    Nos nostraque Deo
    Dec 6, 2010
    94,450
    You voted for someone who you know is a gun grabber.
    You have publicly excoriated anyone who refused to do the same.
    You voted for Larry Hogan, who is left of Bill Clinton.

    No one should be on your side.

    You are making this personal. You NEVER had the right to tell me who to vote for... or how to vote.

    "Publicly excoriated"? Really? :lol2:

    You mean the way you talk to and about anyone who voted for anyone you don't like?
    Get over yourself. :sad20:
     

    Moon

    M-O-O-N, that spells...
    Jan 4, 2013
    2,367
    In Orbit
    I have said that several times... :shrug:

    You voted for someone who you know is a gun grabber.
    You have publicly excoriated anyone who refused to do the same.
    You voted for Larry Hogan, who is left of Bill Clinton.

    You're on the wrong side.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,527
    Messages
    7,285,109
    Members
    33,473
    Latest member
    Sarca

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom