DubTap21
Active Member
Frosh can go take a flying f***.
Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N930T using Tapatalk
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Glad to see our Maryland tax dollars are being used to defend Massachusetts gun control laws. Yes I'm oversimplifying but that's the message we need to carry to the voters. I don't think enough will listen on gun control issues, but some voters may listen about someone recklessly pissing their tax dollars away on frivolous ideological lawsuits. Not just this one but ALL the silly lawsuits Little Brian has filed.
Frosh is not ignorant of real facts or other states' reality (no blood in the streets)
Ideology trumps everything else.
Liberalism and it's complete lack of recognition of reality in spite of facts to the contrary.
It's in his DNA.
Ideology trumps everything else.
Liberalism and it's complete lack of recognition of reality in spite of facts to the contrary.
It's in his DNA.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Ed Zachary.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Attachments
This state put these people/that party into office and now we can't get them out. The Democrats have managed to take gerrymandering to the extreme and absolutely destroy constitutional representation in Maryland. I live in the 12th Legislative District, 3rd Congressional District - Gerrymandering I know! Didn't our founding fathers warn us that this could happen?
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
Yep, and they also gave us a remedy.
Attachments
drthv8r
Active Member
Brian Frosh is a complete and total douche-bag. What else do you expect from an ass-clown that's still sporting a 70s porn mustache?
Chowda69
Active Member
Massachusetts has a permit scheme system. So how does allowing properly permitted citizens with a "known to be in need of self defense" and properly permitted citizens with without a specific need equal to a dangerous criminal ? Both permit process would be the same. Or does the idiot really not understand may issue vs. shall issue ?
I'm certain that "that idiot" is in the pay of, at the very least Bloomberg, and at the political mercy of every crazy cat lady in MD.
I'm given to understand that MA's scheme empowers the local sheriff to issue permits, and that they are essentially "Shall Issue" outside of Boston and its suburbs. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Mass allows the chief in your town to choose to issue an unrestricted class A license (which allows concealed carry). Some towns, like Andover, the chief refuses to issue an unrestricted license unless you are LEO or it is work related. In other towns, a unrestricted lisence is all they issue.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
Timonium Gun Show April 27-28 (Timonium Fairgrounds Exhibition Hall) (2 Viewers)
- Started by joro55
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
-
Convicted For Building Guns; Judge says, “Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom” (2 Viewers)- Started by Harrys
- Replies: 1