Straightbolt
unindicted co-conspirator
Great deal on quality German made .303 British ammo. https://www.sgammo.com/product/303-...lus-ammo-174-grain-bi-metal-fmj-1980s-vintage
Impressive but why would Germany make mil spec or looking 303 Brit???
Because you told them to Drill Sergeant?!!!
Nope 303 is a pu$$y round compared to their own 8mm.
Ballistic wise it's almost a carbon copy of the 30-40.
Nope 303 is a pu$$y round compared to their own 8mm.
Ballistic wise it's almost a carbon copy of the 30-40.
If someone was shooting at me, I think I'd rather have 10 rds of the pu$$y round vs 5 of the manly round.
I was actually talking about a head to head with bolt action rifles, hence the 10 rds vs 5 reference
I'll go out on a limb, I put forth that 8x57 , .303, .30-06, and 7.62x54R all round off as equivalent rounds . ( And in the old doesn't mean ineffective department , .30-40 will do 97% of anything a .30cal Mil round round need to do .)
Yeah , MG-42 were fine weapons . But BREN and Lewis guns also have admirable real world track records .
And along Todbiker's line of discussion -
The M98 Mauser was foundational to virtually all subsequent bolt actions( meaning the actual actions .)
The SMLE was the epitome of bolt action rifles ( meaning the complete rifle) for actual combat .
SMLE was exactly as strong as it needed to be, with the benefit of smoother, with higher rate of fire .
I agree the Mauser, and Springfield are stronger, easier to scope, and better suited for dedicated target/ sniping rifle . From our modern day perspective those are important qualities, again agreement . Our counter viewpoint is those qualities aren't defining for a general issue infantry rifle .
People love it, I understand... I'm just not one of them. Not a fan of the Russian either even though I own one and it too does everything it's supposed to do.
Getting back to my original curiosity, why would the Germans manufacture this particle batch to what looks to be milspec????