It's sounds like the "elitist" hunters, do not want to put up with the public hunters.
They should be happy to save money, not leasing the land.
They should be happy to save money, not leasing the land.
...
2) If you don't see the correlation between our gun hating AG and removing hunters with guns from the state's lands then you haven't been paying attention to what Frosh and his sycophants have been doing to ALL gun owners
3) This isn't opening up more hunting property for just anyone..there will still be a lottery and people will still have to be selected to be able to hunt...
essentially yes. at the direction of Frosh
I hunt...a lot...but I will be damned if they will ever get my firearms without a fight...
.A hunter that refuses to stand up for their 2A rights deserves to have their guns taken. See, this is the problem. Those who choose to sit on the sidelines are NOT always hunters. I know 2 guys at my work who own nothing but Glocks and ARs and they do NOTHING for gun rights support. Hell, they don't even vote. Yet here you are, labeling hunters as Fudds. ALL hunters resent the term Fudd. You do know that, right? Even those who are neck-deep in political activism. It implies an incompetent hunter; doesn't matter how you intend it.
2) If you don't see the correlation between our gun hating AG and removing hunters with guns from the state's lands then you haven't been paying attention to what Frosh and his sycophants have been doing to ALL gun owners"removing hunters with guns"???? That's just stupid. Nowhere is it saying hunters with guns are being removed. I hate Frosh, but let's not sensationalize everything.
3) This isn't opening up more hunting property for just anyone..there will still be a lottery and people will still have to be selected to be able to hunt...GOOD!!! Let's open up the land for other TAXPAYERS to use what they pay for.
Yeah I’d probably be pissed but I think it’s a stretch to say this is an attack on hunting.
It seems like you are being overly dramatic calming an assault on the second amendment and hunting in an attempt to drum up support for maintaining your personal hunting lease. Sorry I’m just not feeling the outrage.
Publicly owned land opened to the whole public who purchases a hunting license and applies to the lottery.
Hmmm. That is SOOOOO gun grabber.
Nobody is removing hunters from state lands. It's making public land available to more than an exclusive clique, as it should be. Hence, your correlation is moot as there is no cause and affect. Kind of like vaccinations and autism; you're cause and affect just ain't there.
The lottery system is there to keep the place from being flooded on opening day and facilitate habitat and game management. Practiced in quite a few states and EVERYONE who applies has the same chance. Uh oh, that pisses off the clique elites who want exclusive use of public land, doesn't it?
Edit: Oooh. This reminds me of people like Robert Redford wanting mountain streams closed to fishing, except to a special few like himself who deserve it because they appreciate ecology and nature.
This is probably the first time frosh has actually done something good.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
This is Brian Frosh we're talking about. He has never, and will never, do anything good for firearms owners in Maryland.
Eventually his true motivation will become apparent. Meanwhile, he's driving wedges into our community, just to see what he can break.
Where are the leases with the best managed deer? That's where I want to hunt.