Polytech M14

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • paperwork351

    no error code for stupid
    Mar 7, 2008
    883
    Gaithersburg
    The M14forum.com has a lot of information. Gus Fisher link below
    https://m14forum.com/gus-fisher/89234-magazine-fit-problems.html

    This didn't work for me so I looked further. What fixed the binding problem was...the chinese handguard was resting on the wood causing the the front of the receiver to sit at an angle when the trigger housing was latched.. This pressed in on the magazine well. Put the receiver in the stock and latch the trigger housing.There should be a gap between the bottom edges of the handguard and the wood. I installed a usgi handguard and the magazines don't bind. You could sand the bottom edges to get the gap. Do a search of polytech mag issues. Gus Fisher has a 24 or so step guide and Art Lupino articles helped. tonyben has a video on disassembly of the gas system and addresses the handguard gap and draw pressure.

    tonyben has removed his videos from youtube. He is a moderator on m14forum.com so they are somewhere.
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    The M14forum.com has a lot of information. Gus Fisher link below
    https://m14forum.com/gus-fisher/89234-magazine-fit-problems.html

    This didn't work for me so I looked further. What fixed the binding problem was...the chinese handguard was resting on the wood causing the the front of the receiver to sit at an angle when the trigger housing was latched.. This pressed in on the magazine well. Put the receiver in the stock and latch the trigger housing.There should be a gap between the bottom edge of the handguard and the wood. I installed a usgi handguard and the magazines don't bind. You could sand the bottom edges to get the gap. Do a search of polytech mag issues. Gus Fisher has a 24 or so step guide and Art Lupino articles helped. tonyben has a video on disassembly of the gas system and addresses the handguard gap and draw pressure.

    tonyben has removed his videos. He is a moderator on m14forum.com they are somewhere.

    Great info.
    Thanks
     

    ST19AG_WGreymon

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 16, 2009
    2,408
    Odenton
    Polytech receivers are great, more mil-spec than the Springfield Armory receviers. The only issue is the bolt, which tends to be soft. Most people recommend buying a USGI bolt and having it worked on by WarBird Custom Guns.
     

    Bertfish

    Throw bread on me
    Mar 13, 2013
    17,688
    White Marsh, MD
    You may be correct. I was thinking AR10 Mags not M1A mags..

    I've frequently bitched at them on their various social media platforms to make an M1A magazine. Can get a G36 mag but not an M1A, assume that has to do with foreign military contracts. Either way I've never seen one and they don't seem to view me as a market expert
     

    Eastwind

    Nice!
    May 3, 2020
    119
    I was actually about to pick one of these bad boys up in a trade for my gen 2 night vision but the guy backed out and ended up just giving it to his father. Still bummed out about it, to be honest.
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    Polytech receivers are great, more mil-spec than the Springfield Armory receviers. The only issue is the bolt, which tends to be soft. Most people recommend buying a USGI bolt and having it worked on by WarBird Custom Guns.

    The previous owner had the bolt assembly replaced with a USGI assembly. WarBird did all the customizing on this weapon.That had a lot to do with me buying this one.
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    Polytech receivers are great, more mil-spec than the Springfield Armory receviers. The only issue is the bolt, which tends to be soft. Most people recommend buying a USGI bolt and having it worked on by WarBird Custom Guns.

    I am retired Air Force. I see you are well decorated. Thank you for your service.
    I have a lot of medals from my Air Force service.
    I have metals in my legs, metals in my back, and metals in my shoulder.
     

    ST19AG_WGreymon

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 16, 2009
    2,408
    Odenton
    The previous owner had the bolt assembly replaced with a USGI assembly. WarBird did all the customizing on this weapon.That had a lot to do with me buying this one.

    Sounds like a really good buy then. My Polytech is waiting to be worked on, have yet to send it out. Thank you for your service, I'm 9 years in, hoping to make it to 20.
     
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    The previous owner had the bolt assembly replaced with a USGI assembly. WarBird did all the customizing on this weapon.That had a lot to do with me buying this one.

    Not that I give a damn personally but aint what made the Polys legal vs an M1A is that a USGI bolt dont fit?
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    The MD list is crazy. It was put together by politicians who don't really understand guns. The M1A is banned as is the M14 (of course). If you look up the Polytech M14 is is listed as not banned. The Norinco is not on the list. That means if you want a Norinco, you must submit all sorts of BS paperwork to MSP. They will in time approve or disapprove it and it will be on the list as banned or not banned.
    There is no real rhyme or reason for how the list was originally put together.

    One thing on the list states if a weapon is a copy of a banned weapon, but has no more than two of the military components (a folding stock; a grenade launcher or flare launcher; or a flash suppressor) and the parts are not interchangeable, then it can be approved. There is a lot to it than that, but the basics.
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    Maryland State Police Firearms Search
    http://www.mdsp.org/Organization/Pages/CriminalInvestigationBureau/LicensingDivision/Firearms/FirearmSearch.aspx?View=%7Beb794138-ce9c-4e9e-b3d2-b78c316f87df%7D&SortField=Justification&SortDir=Asc

    POLYTECH ‎(1)
    Polytech
    Polytech Inc M14
    Not Banned Not Regulated by Statute 8/5/2014

    Springfield Armory
    Springfield Armory M1A Loaded-6.5 Creedmoor
    Not Banned Does not meet the definition of a copycat weapon or the definition of a copy, or enumerated weapon in statute 5/2/2018 (because it is not a .308?)

    Springfield Armory
    Springfield Armory M1-A SOCOM 16
    Banned Copy of an enumerated weapon 1/6/2019

    Springfield Armory
    Springfield Armory BM-59, SAR-48, G3, SAR-3, M-21 sniper rifle, M1A, excluding the M1 Garand
    Banned Enumerated in Statute 10/1/2013

    Norinco
    MAK-90
    Banned Copy of an AK-47

    Norinco
    Norinco 84S
    Not Banned Does not meet the definition of a copycat weapon or the definition of a copy of an enumerated weapon 2/28/2018 (Looks like an AK-47 but loads a 5.56mmx45mm!)
     

    Rambler

    Doing the best with the worst.
    Oct 22, 2011
    2,219
    The MD list is crazy. It was put together by politicians who don't really understand guns. The M1A is banned as is the M14 (of course). If you look up the Polytech M14 is is listed as not banned. The Norinco is not on the list. That means if you want a Norinco, you must submit all sorts of BS paperwork to MSP. They will in time approve or disapprove it and it will be on the list as banned or not banned.
    There is no real rhyme or reason for how the list was originally put together.

    One thing on the list states if a weapon is a copy of a banned weapon, but has no more than two of the military components (a folding stock; a grenade launcher or flare launcher; or a flash suppressor) and the parts are not interchangeable, then it can be approved. There is a lot to it than that, but the basics.

    There were other manufacturers of M1A rifles. Some used all GI parts others all Chinese and some were a mixture. None of these are on the list and proving a metric one is not a "copy" would require parts from a GI and or thread gages.
     

    Bertfish

    Throw bread on me
    Mar 13, 2013
    17,688
    White Marsh, MD
    The MD list is crazy. It was put together by politicians who don't really understand guns. The M1A is banned as is the M14 (of course). If you look up the Polytech M14 is is listed as not banned. The Norinco is not on the list. That means if you want a Norinco, you must submit all sorts of BS paperwork to MSP. They will in time approve or disapprove it and it will be on the list as banned or not banned.
    There is no real rhyme or reason for how the list was originally put together.
    One thing on the list states if a weapon is a copy of a banned weapon, but has no more than two of the military components (a folding stock; a grenade launcher or flare launcher; or a flash suppressor) and the parts are not interchangeable, then it can be approved. There is a lot to it than that, but the basics.

    The list is not legally binding. MSP has stated so although I lack the source document.

    Norinco can be sold cash and carry still today because it has a metric gas plug. Not totally parts interchangeable with the banned M14/M1A.
     
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    The list is not legally binding. MSP has stated so although I lack the source document.

    Norinco can be sold cash and carry still today because it has a metric gas plug. Not totally parts interchangeable with the banned M14/M1A.

    Same thing with the Poly cuz that uses a metric bolt

    But since his has a USGI bolt, does that now make it a copy of a M1A?
     

    Sirex

    Powered by natural gas
    Oct 30, 2010
    10,442
    Westminster, MD
    I can tell you exactly what your problem is. Two words. Pro mag. They are horrible. There is a running joke in some firearm circles no mag is better than pro mag. Go buy the Magpul

    No joke. I bought 3 Promags for my 7.62x39 Vepr in PA. Only 1 out of the 3 fit. I will say, Promag was a stand up company, and offered to replace the whole mag. I explained to them I could not have a whole mag shipped to MD, and asked if they could just ship the hollow mag shells, which they did quickly.

    I got a couple 20 round Vepr 308 Promag magazine in early 2013 before the ban, and they kinda sorta fit. Had to file a bit. Try some regular 10rd M1A/M14 mags. I saw some on eBay not too long ago, I'll check. They may have gotten removed.
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    The list is not legally binding. MSP has stated so although I lack the source document.

    Norinco can be sold cash and carry still today because it has a metric gas plug. Not totally parts interchangeable with the banned M14/M1A.

    It may not be binding, but try to get an FFL to order or accept a shipment of one that is banned on the list or not on the list and they will laugh at you!
     

    tlino

    I learn better hands on w
    Dec 28, 2014
    100
    Frederick
    Same thing with the Poly cuz that uses a metric bolt

    But since his has a USGI bolt, does that now make it a copy of a M1A?

    There are other features that would over ride that one item, I think. Besides, the action says it is a polytech. I think that is as far as an FFL looks.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,587
    Messages
    7,287,589
    Members
    33,482
    Latest member
    Claude

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom